165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2741517)
21. [Experience with the use of computer processing of the cardiac signal in the bedside ECG monitoring of patients in a cardiological resuscitation department].
Val'denberg AV
Ter Arkh; 1994; 66(9):34-6. PubMed ID: 7992209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of the extension of Q-waves after infarction with body surface map: relationship with infarct size.
Bodí V; Sanchis J; Guillem MS; Núñez J; López-Lereu MP; Gómez C; Moratal D; Chorro FJ; Millet J; Llàcer A
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Aug; 111(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 16242798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Current clinical utility of body surface mapping.
Horwitz LI
J Invasive Cardiol; 1995 Dec; 7(9):265-74. PubMed ID: 10158379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Evaluation of the cardiotoxicity of psychotropic drugs with automated ECG processing].
Dudeck J; Hullmann R
Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1976; 9():61-5. PubMed ID: 802941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Computerized electrocardiography: some references for comparison].
Zywietz C
Fortschr Med; 1989 Jun; 107(18):87. PubMed ID: 2666292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Validity of telephone ECG multichannel transmission].
Dirschedl P; Lenz S; Löllgen H; Fahrenkrog U
Z Kardiol; 1996 Sep; 85(9):677-83. PubMed ID: 8992812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparison of 3 ECG computer programs with interpretation by physicians].
Saner H; Lindeland A; Scallen R; Paule W; Lange HW; Gobel FL
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Jul; 117(27-28):1035-9. PubMed ID: 3303319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Will the body surface map replace the signal averaged electrocardiogram and other computerized techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias?
Cohen TJ
J Invasive Cardiol; 1995 Dec; 7(9):275-6. PubMed ID: 10158380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Behavior of various activity-controlled cardiac pacemakers in treadmill stress tests with variable slopes].
Matula M; Hölzer K; Zitzmann E; Schön H; Alt E
Z Kardiol; 1993 Feb; 82(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 8465563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computerized system for assessing heart rate variability.
Frigy A; Incze A; Brânzaniuc E; Cotoi S
Rom J Intern Med; 1996; 34(3-4):253-62. PubMed ID: 9167226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Why do we need supercomputers to understand the electrocardiographic T wave?
Potse M; LeBlanc AR; Vinet A
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2007 Jul; 7 Suppl 1():123-4. PubMed ID: 17584703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology.
Surawicz B; Childers R; Deal BJ; Gettes LS; Bailey JJ; Gorgels A; Hancock EW; Josephson M; Kligfield P; Kors JA; Macfarlane P; Mason JW; Mirvis DM; Okin P; Pahlm O; Rautaharju PM; van Herpen G; Wagner GS; Wellens H; ; ;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(11):976-81. PubMed ID: 19281930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology.
Surawicz B; Childers R; Deal BJ; Gettes LS; Bailey JJ; Gorgels A; Hancock EW; Josephson M; Kligfield P; Kors JA; Macfarlane P; Mason JW; Mirvis DM; Okin P; Pahlm O; Rautaharju PM; van Herpen G; Wagner GS; Wellens H; ; ;
Circulation; 2009 Mar; 119(10):e235-40. PubMed ID: 19228822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Automatic classification of the greatly amplified ECG in relation to time and frequency].
Voss A; Kurths J; Fiehring H; Kleiner HJ
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1991 Mar; 36(3):51-5. PubMed ID: 2054459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A review of computer ECG analysis: time to evaluate and standardize.
Willems JL
Crit Rev Med Inform; 1986; 1(2):165-207. PubMed ID: 3333022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Possibilities of signal-averaged orthogonal and vector electrocardiography for locating and size evaluation of acute myocardial infarction with ST-elevation.
Matveev M; Krasteva V; Naydenov S; Donova T
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2007 Jul; 7 Suppl 1():193-7. PubMed ID: 17584723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A wavelet-based ECG delineator: evaluation on standard databases.
Martínez JP; Almeida R; Olmos S; Rocha AP; Laguna P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 51(4):570-81. PubMed ID: 15072211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [A flexible ECG compression algorithm based on wavelet transformation for use in transmission systems].
Niederholz J; vom Bögel G; Schwarz M; Hosticka BJ
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():65-6. PubMed ID: 9517049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. ST shape classification in ECG by constructing reference ST set.
Jeong GY; Yu KH; Yoon MJ; Inooka E
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Nov; 32(9):1025-31. PubMed ID: 20688553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Arrhythmia analysis with an expert system.
Redman TC; Hahn AW
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1989; 25():221-5. PubMed ID: 2742969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
