These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27416268)

  • 1. Automated facial recognition and candidate list rank change of computer generated facial approximations generated with multiple eye orb positions.
    Parks CL; Monson KL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():396-398. PubMed ID: 27416268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognizability of computer-generated facial approximations in an automated facial recognition context for potential use in unidentified persons data repositories: Optimally and operationally modeled conditions.
    Parks CL; Monson KL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():272-278. PubMed ID: 30108019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biometric correspondence between reface computerized facial approximations and CT-derived ground truth skin surface models objectively examined using an automated facial recognition system.
    Parks CL; Monson KL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():8-11. PubMed ID: 29525402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary performance assessment of computer automated facial approximations using computed tomography scans of living individuals.
    Parks CL; Richard AH; Monson KL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):133-9. PubMed ID: 24314512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated facial recognition of manually generated clay facial approximations: Potential application in unidentified persons data repositories.
    Parks CL; Monson KL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jan; 282():133-136. PubMed ID: 29197243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition of computerized facial approximations by familiar assessors.
    Richard AH; Monson KL
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):431-438. PubMed ID: 29173456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial approximation: globe projection guideline falsified by exophthalmometry literature.
    Stephan CN
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jul; 47(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 12136981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition by forensic facial approximation: case specific examples and empirical tests.
    Stephan CN; Henneberg M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(2-3):182-91. PubMed ID: 15955649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement of eyeball protrusion and its application in facial reconstruction.
    Wilkinson CM; Mautner SA
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 12570193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The placement of the human eyeball and canthi in craniofacial identification.
    Stephan CN; Davidson PL
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 May; 53(3):612-9. PubMed ID: 18471206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of presentation methods for ReFace computerized facial approximations.
    Richard AH; Parks CL; Monson KL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Sep; 242():283-292. PubMed ID: 25128751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further evidence on the anatomical placement of the human eyeball for facial approximation and craniofacial superimposition.
    Stephan CN; Huang AJ; Davidson PL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):267-9. PubMed ID: 19220653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing facial approximation accuracy: how do resemblance ratings of disparate faces compare to recognition tests?
    Stephan CN; Arthur RS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159 Suppl 1():S159-63. PubMed ID: 16533582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personal Identification of Deceased Persons: An Overview of the Current Methods Based on Physical Appearance.
    Caplova Z; Obertova Z; Gibelli DM; De Angelis D; Mazzarelli D; Sforza C; Cattaneo C
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):662-671. PubMed ID: 28973829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the accuracy of facial approximations: a comparative study of resemblance rating and face array methods.
    Stephan CN; Cicolini J
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 18279241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Building faces from dry skulls: are they recognized above chance rates?
    Stephan CN; Henneberg M
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 11372979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic facial approximation assessment: can application of different average facial tissue depth data facilitate recognition and establish acceptable level of resemblance?
    Herrera LM; Strapasson RAP; da Silva JVL; Melani RFH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():311-319. PubMed ID: 27352136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison Among Manual Facial Approximations Conducted by Two Methodological Approaches of Face Prediction.
    Herrera LM; Strapasson RAP; Zanin AA; da Silva JVL; Melani RFH
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Sep; 62(5):1279-1285. PubMed ID: 28230902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial approximation of 'angel': case specific methodological review.
    Hayes S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():e30-41. PubMed ID: 24582078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial approximations: Characteristics of the eye in a South African sample.
    Dorfling HF; Lockhat Z; Pretorius S; Steyn M; Oettlé AC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():46-53. PubMed ID: 29558686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.