164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27416618)
1. Evaluation of low-template DNA profiles using peak heights.
Steele CD; Greenhalgh M; Balding DJ
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2016 Oct; 15(5):431-445. PubMed ID: 27416618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing whether stutter and low-level DNA peaks are additive.
Buckleton JS; Lohmueller KE; Inman K; Cheng K; Curran JM; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102166. PubMed ID: 31586815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of mixed-source, low-template DNA profiles in forensic science.
Balding DJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jul; 110(30):12241-6. PubMed ID: 23818643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation and validation of an improved allele specific stutter filtering method for electropherogram interpretation.
Kalafut T; Schuerman C; Sutton J; Faris T; Armogida L; Bright JA; Buckleton J; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():50-56. PubMed ID: 29660688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidential evaluation of DNA profiles using a discrete statistical model implemented in the DNA LiRa software.
Puch-Solis R; Clayton T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():220-8. PubMed ID: 24815372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of mixsep software package: Performance verification of male-mixed DNA analysis.
Hu N; Cong B; Gao T; Chen Y; Shen J; Li S; Ma C
Mol Med Rep; 2015 Aug; 12(2):2431-42. PubMed ID: 25936428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting peak height variability for short tandem repeat data.
Taylor D; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():126-33. PubMed ID: 26774098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Yara Gambirasio case: Combining evidence in a complex DNA mixture case.
Graversen T; Mortera J; Lago G
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():52-63. PubMed ID: 30776772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New stutter ratio distribution for DNA mixture interpretation based on a continuous model.
Manabe S; Hamano Y; Morimoto C; Kawai C; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Mar; 19():16-21. PubMed ID: 26980248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
