BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27416948)

  • 1. Measuring the Impact of Electronic Health Record Adoption on Charge Capture.
    Edwardson N; Kash BA; Janakiraman R
    Med Care Res Rev; 2017 Oct; 74(5):582-594. PubMed ID: 27416948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physician EHR Adoption and Potentially Preventable Hospital Admissions among Medicare Beneficiaries: Panel Data Evidence, 2010-2013.
    Lammers EJ; McLaughlin CG; Barna M
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Dec; 51(6):2056-2075. PubMed ID: 27766628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of the HITECH financial incentives on EHR adoption in small, physician-owned practices.
    Cohen MF
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Oct; 94():143-54. PubMed ID: 27573322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011.
    Hsiao CJ; Hing E; Socey TC; Cai B
    NCHS Data Brief; 2011 Nov; (79):1-8. PubMed ID: 22617322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Despite substantial progress In EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings.
    Furukawa MF; King J; Patel V; Hsiao CJ; Adler-Milstein J; Jha AK
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Sep; 33(9):1672-9. PubMed ID: 25104827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does electronic health record use improve hospital financial performance? Evidence from panel data.
    Collum TH; Menachemi N; Sen B
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2016; 41(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 26052785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic externalities of health information technology. A game theoretic model for electronic health record adoption.
    Woodside JM
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2007; 21(4):25-31. PubMed ID: 19195278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Undirected health IT implementation in ambulatory care favors paper-based workarounds and limits health data exchange.
    Djalali S; Ursprung N; Rosemann T; Senn O; Tandjung R
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Nov; 84(11):920-32. PubMed ID: 26296433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of payer mix on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
    Menachemi N; Matthews MC; Ford EW; Brooks RG
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2007; 32(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 17438394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The current state of electronic health record (EHR) use in Oklahoma.
    Khaliq AA; Mwachofi AK; Hughes DR; Broyles RW; Wheeler D; Roswell RH
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2013 Feb; 106(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 23620983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using multi-stakeholder alliances to accelerate the adoption of health information technology by physician practices.
    McHugh M; Shi Y; McClellan SR; Shortell SM; Fareed N; Harvey J; Ramsay P; Casalino LP
    Healthc (Amst); 2016 Jun; 4(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 27343156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians.
    Abdolrasulnia M; Menachemi N; Shewchuk RM; Ginter PM; Duncan WJ; Brooks RG
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2008; 33(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 18580304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A business case for HIT adoption: effects of "meaningful use" EHR financial incentives on clinic revenue.
    Behkami NA; Dorr DA; Morrice S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):779-83. PubMed ID: 20841792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where are we on the diffusion curve? Trends and drivers of primary care physicians' use of health information technology.
    Audet AM; Squires D; Doty MM
    Health Serv Res; 2014 Feb; 49(1 Pt 2):347-60. PubMed ID: 24358958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are low income patients receiving the benefits of electronic health records? A statewide survey.
    Butler MJ; Harootunian G; Johnson WG
    Health Informatics J; 2013 Jun; 19(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 23715209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician productivity and the ambulatory EHR in a large academic multi-specialty physician group.
    Cheriff AD; Kapur AG; Qiu M; Cole CL
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jul; 79(7):492-500. PubMed ID: 20478738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Market factors and electronic medical record adoption in medical practices.
    Menachemi N; Mazurenko O; Kazley AS; Diana ML; Ford EW
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2012; 37(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 22016180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Building an electronic health record integrated quality of life outcomes registry for spine surgery.
    Azad TD; Kalani M; Wolf T; Kearney A; Lee Y; Flannery L; Chen D; Berroya R; Eisenberg M; Park J; Shuer L; Kerr A; Ratliff JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):176-85. PubMed ID: 26431073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions of electronic health record implementation: a statewide survey of physicians in Rhode Island.
    Wylie MC; Baier RR; Gardner RL
    Am J Med; 2014 Oct; 127(10):1010.e21-7. PubMed ID: 24945882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of an Electronic Health Record System With a Disease Management Program and Health Care Treatment Costs for Danish Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
    Pulleyblank R; Mellace G; Olsen KR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e206603. PubMed ID: 32453386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.