623 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27417131)
1. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study.
Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Thomsen F; Kronlachner D; Kurosch M; Obaje A; Anding R; Pottek T; Rose A; Olianas R; Friedl A; Hübner W; Homberg R; Pfitzenmaier J; Grein U; Queissert F; Naumann CM; Schweiger J; Wotzka C; Nyarangi-Dix J; Hofmann T; Ulm K; Bauer RM; Haferkamp A;
Urol Int; 2017; 99(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 27598774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary on: Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Horstmann M
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1577. PubMed ID: 27394137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Low Serum Albumin Correlates With Adverse Events Following Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence: Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.
Ginsburg KB; Schwabe JR; Cochrane JA; Tapper A; Burks F; Rambhatla A
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():178-182. PubMed ID: 31866523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of adjustable male slings and artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of male urinary incontinence: a retrospective analysis of patient selection and postoperative continence status.
Grabbert M; Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Anding R; Rose A; Friedl A; Obaje A; Heidenreich A; Brehmer B; Naumann CM; Queissert F; Loertzer H; Pfitzenmaier J; Nyarangi-Dix J; Kurosch M; Olianas R; Homberg R; Abdunnur R; Schweiger J; Hofmann T; Wotzka C; Pottek T; Huebner W; Haferkamp A; Bauer RM
World J Urol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1415-1420. PubMed ID: 30341450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Male Sling and Artificial Urethral Sphincter for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Certifying American Urologists.
Liu JS; Hofer MD; Milose J; Oberlin DT; Flury SC; Morey AF; Gonzalez CM
Urology; 2016 Jan; 87():95-9. PubMed ID: 26344152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Waves of Change: National Trends in Surgical Management of Male Stress Incontinence.
MacDonald S; Colaco M; Terlecki R
Urology; 2017 Oct; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 28709851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Constable L; Cotterill N; Cooper D; Glazener C; Drake MJ; Forrest M; Harding C; Kilonzo M; MacLennan G; McCormack K; McDonald A; Mundy A; Norrie J; Pickard R; Ramsay C; Smith R; Wileman S; Abrams P;
Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 29467024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: results of the artificial urinary sphincter after suburethral sling failure].
Belot PY; Fassi-Fehri H; Crouzet S; Codas R; Badet L; Gelet A; Martin X
Prog Urol; 2012 Oct; 22(11):644-9. PubMed ID: 22999089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outperforms Sling for Moderate Male Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Khouri RK; Ortiz NM; Baumgarten AS; Ward EE; VanDyke ME; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
Urology; 2020 Jul; 141():168-172. PubMed ID: 32289365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications of Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence Among Female Military Beneficiaries.
Howard DL; McGlynn A; Greer JA
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jun; 27(6):830-835. PubMed ID: 29320304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of Frailty on Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement and Removal Procedures.
Medendorp AR; Anger JT; Jin C; Amin KA; Hampson LA; Lee UJ; Suskind AM
Urology; 2019 Jul; 129():210-216. PubMed ID: 31005655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What if artificial urinary sphincter is not possible? Feasibility and effectiveness of ProACT for patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated by sling.
Munier P; Nicolas M; Tricard T; Droupy S; Costa P; Saussine C
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jun; 39(5):1417-1422. PubMed ID: 32249971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study.
Sacco E; Gandi C; Marino F; Totaro A; Di Gianfrancesco L; Palermo G; Pierconti F; Racioppi M; Bassi P
BJU Int; 2021 Feb; 127(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 32744793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials.
Daneshgari F; Kong W; Swartz M
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1890-7. PubMed ID: 18801499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence.
Léon P; Chartier-Kastler E; Rouprêt M; Ambrogi V; Mozer P; Phé V
BJU Int; 2015 Jun; 115(6):951-7. PubMed ID: 24958004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of a Noninferiority Randomised Controlled Trial of Surgery for Men with Urodynamic Stress Incontinence After Prostate Surgery (MASTER).
Abrams P; Constable LD; Cooper D; MacLennan G; Drake MJ; Harding C; Mundy A; McCormack K; McDonald A; Norrie J; Ramsay C; Smith R; Cotterill N; Kilonzo M; Glazener C;
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):812-823. PubMed ID: 33551297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in 11 women with urinary stress incontinence: surgical technique and initial experience.
Biardeau X; Rizk J; Marcelli F; Flamand V
Eur Urol; 2015 May; 67(5):937-42. PubMed ID: 25582931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary series.
Wiedemann L; Cornu JN; Haab E; Peyrat L; Beley S; Cathelineau X; Haab F
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1163-8. PubMed ID: 24053170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prior male sling does not affect outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter.
Chow PM; Agrawal-Patel S; Wood H; Angermeier K
BJU Int; 2024 May; 133(5):564-569. PubMed ID: 38243854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
