These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27418216)

  • 1. Hysterectomy trends for benign indications over a 15-year period in an academic teaching center in Poland: a retrospective cohort study.
    Romanek-Piva K; Gałczyński K; Adamiak-Godlewska A; Futyma K; Miotła P; Rechberger T
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 27418216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.
    Huang CC; Lo TS; Huang YT; Long CY; Law KS; Wu MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):65-73.e1. PubMed ID: 30928611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physician preference?
    Dorsey JH; Steinberg EP; Holtz PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1452-60. PubMed ID: 7503184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
    Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis.
    Lundholm C; Forsgren C; Johansson AL; Cnattingius S; Altman D
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19140043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions.
    Barber EL; Neubauer NL; Gossett DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):609.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25511239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
    David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Assesment of selected parameters depending on the size of abdominal wall incision in patients subjected to minilaparotomy due to benign gynaecological diseases].
    Malinowski A; Matyszewski A; Bartosiak-Majcher I; Wojciechowski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 18592854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subtotal versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy: could women sexual function recovery overcome the surgical outcomes in pre-operatory decision making?
    Saccardi C; Gizzo S; Noventa M; Quaranta M; Borgato S; Conte L; Pluchino N; Litta P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25501834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysterectomy in Poland between 2011 and 2016. Changing trends in the surgical approach to hysterectomy.
    Lepka P; Jędryka M; Misiek M; Matkowski R
    Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(10):529-535. PubMed ID: 30393839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
    Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Laparoscopy-assisted and -prepared hysterectomy. A series of 80 cases].
    Darai E; Filippini F; Benifla JL; Guglielmina JN; Pennehouat G; Deval B; Madelenat P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 8815133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk Factors for Bowel Injury in Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
    Zhu CR; Mallick R; Singh SS; Auer R; Solnik J; Choudhry AJ; Chen I
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 32925612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hysterectomies for benign pathology: is there a place for laparoscopic surgery?].
    Anquetil C; Capella-Alouc S; Fernandez H
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Apr; 27(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 10349772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology.
    Han GS
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8829066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
    Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
    Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hysterectomies in Portugal (2000-2014): What has changed?
    Gante I; Medeiros-Borges C; Águas F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():97-102. PubMed ID: 27914240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of vaginal hysterectomy in Denmark: rates, indications and patient characteristics.
    Nielsen SL; Daugbjerg SB; Gimbel H; Settnes A;
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):978-84. PubMed ID: 21623739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.
    Wasson MN; Hoffman MK
    Del Med J; 2015 Feb; 87(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 25876290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical Well-Being and Route of Benign Hysterectomy.
    Waldman I; Wagner S; Kulaylat AS; Deimling TA
    Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(5):456-461. PubMed ID: 30177340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.