162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27418216)
1. Hysterectomy trends for benign indications over a 15-year period in an academic teaching center in Poland: a retrospective cohort study.
Romanek-Piva K; Gałczyński K; Adamiak-Godlewska A; Futyma K; Miotła P; Rechberger T
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 27418216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.
Huang CC; Lo TS; Huang YT; Long CY; Law KS; Wu MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):65-73.e1. PubMed ID: 30928611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physician preference?
Dorsey JH; Steinberg EP; Holtz PM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1452-60. PubMed ID: 7503184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy outcomes.
Sarmini OR; Lefholz K; Froeschke HP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15904614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis.
Lundholm C; Forsgren C; Johansson AL; Cnattingius S; Altman D
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19140043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions.
Barber EL; Neubauer NL; Gossett DR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):609.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25511239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Assesment of selected parameters depending on the size of abdominal wall incision in patients subjected to minilaparotomy due to benign gynaecological diseases].
Malinowski A; Matyszewski A; Bartosiak-Majcher I; Wojciechowski M
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 18592854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subtotal versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy: could women sexual function recovery overcome the surgical outcomes in pre-operatory decision making?
Saccardi C; Gizzo S; Noventa M; Quaranta M; Borgato S; Conte L; Pluchino N; Litta P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25501834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hysterectomy in Poland between 2011 and 2016. Changing trends in the surgical approach to hysterectomy.
Lepka P; Jędryka M; Misiek M; Matkowski R
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(10):529-535. PubMed ID: 30393839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease.
Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Laparoscopy-assisted and -prepared hysterectomy. A series of 80 cases].
Darai E; Filippini F; Benifla JL; Guglielmina JN; Pennehouat G; Deval B; Madelenat P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1996; 25(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 8815133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk Factors for Bowel Injury in Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.
Zhu CR; Mallick R; Singh SS; Auer R; Solnik J; Choudhry AJ; Chen I
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 32925612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Hysterectomies for benign pathology: is there a place for laparoscopic surgery?].
Anquetil C; Capella-Alouc S; Fernandez H
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Apr; 27(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 10349772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology.
Han GS
J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8829066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hysterectomies in Portugal (2000-2014): What has changed?
Gante I; Medeiros-Borges C; Águas F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():97-102. PubMed ID: 27914240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of vaginal hysterectomy in Denmark: rates, indications and patient characteristics.
Nielsen SL; Daugbjerg SB; Gimbel H; Settnes A;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Sep; 90(9):978-84. PubMed ID: 21623739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.
Wasson MN; Hoffman MK
Del Med J; 2015 Feb; 87(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 25876290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical Well-Being and Route of Benign Hysterectomy.
Waldman I; Wagner S; Kulaylat AS; Deimling TA
Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(5):456-461. PubMed ID: 30177340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
