BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27418216)

  • 21. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. Impact on resident training.
    Sultana CJ; Sogor L
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8728072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
    Fylstra DL; Carter JF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.
    Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 19016683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hysterectomy types in Estonia are still different from the Nordic countries.
    Veerus P; Lang K; Toompere K; Kirss F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25711677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Health technology assessment of surgical therapies for benign gynaecological disease.
    Owusu-Ansah R; Gatongi D; Chien PF
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):841-79. PubMed ID: 17145485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer.
    Malur S; Possover M; Schneider A
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 11344431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapsed uterus: a retrospective cohort study.
    Fatania K; Vithayathil M; Newbold P; Yoong W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Mar; 174():111-4. PubMed ID: 24412144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Significance of laparoscopic assistance in vaginal hysterectomy].
    Malinowski A; Bobin L; Maciołek-Blewniewska G
    Ginekol Pol; 2005 Jan; 76(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15844562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.
    Nezhat F; Nezhat C; Gordon S; Wilkins E
    J Reprod Med; 1992 Mar; 37(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 1532990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Hysterectomy for benign lesions in the north of France: epidemiology and postoperative events].
    Debodinance P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Apr; 30(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 11319467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
    Muzii L; Basile S; Zupi E; Marconi D; Zullo MA; Manci N; Bellati F; Angioli R; Benedetti Panici P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 17848323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hysterectomy in Denmark 1977-2011: changes in rate, indications, and hospitalization.
    Lykke R; Blaakær J; Ottesen B; Gimbel H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 24094821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Which factors affect the choice of method for hysterectomy in benign disease?].
    Oma J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Mar; 124(6):792-4. PubMed ID: 15039811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Uterine myomatosis--abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy?].
    Kudela M; Zahradnícková V; Hejtmánek P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2003 May; 68(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 12879666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study.
    McPherson K; Metcalfe MA; Herbert A; Maresh M; Casbard A; Hargreaves J; Bridgman S; Clarke A
    BJOG; 2004 Jul; 111(7):688-94. PubMed ID: 15198759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
    Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Saceanu S; Cela V; Surlin V; Angelescu CM; Patrascu S; Georgescu I; Genazzani A
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 23790783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trends in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among Taiwanese women undergoing benign hysterectomy: a population-based, pooled, cross-sectional study.
    Lai JC; Huang N; Wang KL; Hu HY; Chen IT; Chou YJ
    Menopause; 2015 Jul; 22(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 25387346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.
    Whiteman MK; Hillis SD; Jamieson DJ; Morrow B; Podgornik MN; Brett KM; Marchbanks PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 198(1):34.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17981254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.