These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2741863)

  • 1. Normative oscillometric blood pressure values in the first 5 years in an office setting.
    Park MK; Menard SM
    Am J Dis Child; 1989 Jul; 143(7):860-4. PubMed ID: 2741863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normative arm and calf blood pressure values in the newborn.
    Park MK; Lee DH
    Pediatrics; 1989 Feb; 83(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 2913554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A standard protocol for blood pressure measurement in the newborn.
    Nwankwo MU; Lorenz JM; Gardiner JC
    Pediatrics; 1997 Jun; 99(6):E10. PubMed ID: 9164806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The San Antonio Biethnic Children's Blood Pressure Study: auscultatory findings.
    Menard SW; Park MK; Yuan CH
    J Pediatr Health Care; 1999; 13(5):237-44. PubMed ID: 10776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normal oscillometric blood pressure values in Chinese children during their first six years.
    Hwang B; Chu NW
    Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1995; 36(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 7793275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of atrial fibrillation on accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement: effect of ventricular rate.
    Xie F; Xu J; Xia LL; Luo X; Jiang Z; Wu Y; Su H
    Hypertens Res; 2020 Jun; 43(6):518-524. PubMed ID: 31925339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of upper arm and calf oscillometric blood pressure measurement in preterm infants.
    Kunk R; McCain GC
    J Perinatol; 1996; 16(2 Pt 1):89-92. PubMed ID: 8732553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure in preterm and term infants: extent of discrepancy and factors associated with inaccuracy.
    Shimokaze T; Akaba K; Saito E
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Feb; 32(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 24971570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in ill preterm and full-term neonates.
    Lalan S; Blowey D
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2014 Jan; 8(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 24503236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
    Ringrose JS; Polley G; McLean D; Thompson A; Morales F; Padwal R
    Am J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 30(7):683-689. PubMed ID: 28430848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of invasive blood pressure measurement in the aorta with indirect oscillometric blood pressure measurement at the wrist and forearm].
    Saul F; Aristidou Y; Klaus D; Wiemeyer A; Lösse B
    Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):675-85. PubMed ID: 8525669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noninvasive determination of systolic, diastolic and end-systolic blood pressure in neonates, infants and young children: comparison with central aortic pressure measurements.
    Colan SD; Fujii A; Borow KM; MacPherson D; Sanders SP
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):867-70. PubMed ID: 6624679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calf blood pressure: clinical implications and correlations with arm blood pressure in infants and young children.
    Crapanzano MS; Strong WB; Newman IR; Hixon RL; Casal D; Linder CW
    Pediatrics; 1996 Feb; 97(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 8584381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children.
    Ringrose JS; Alabbas A; Jalali A; Khinda H; Morgan C; Yiu V; Alexander RT; Padwal R
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Apr; 24(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 30856623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitability of the forearm for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in children.
    Greaney D; Nakhjavani S; Desmond F; Tormey M; Dawkins I; O'Hare B
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1125-1130. PubMed ID: 29030927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multicentre study on unattended automated office blood pressure measurement in treated hypertensive patients.
    Filipovský J; Seidlerová J; Ceral J; Vysočanová P; Špác J; Souček M; Řiháček I; Mateřánková M; König P; Rosolová H
    Blood Press; 2018 Aug; 27(4):188-193. PubMed ID: 29334262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.