BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27418835)

  • 1. Meta-analysis of cold-knife conization versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Jiang YM; Chen CX; Li L
    Onco Targets Ther; 2016; 9():3907-15. PubMed ID: 27418835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Jiang Y; Chen C; Li L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170587. PubMed ID: 28125627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Cai L; Huang Y; Lin C; Liu G; Mao X; Dong B; Lu T; Sun P
    Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Feb; 9(2):949-957. PubMed ID: 35117440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Santesso N; Mustafa RA; Wiercioch W; Kehar R; Gandhi S; Chen Y; Cheung A; Hopkins J; Khatib R; Ma B; Mustafa AA; Lloyd N; Wu D; Broutet N; Schünemann HJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 26643302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors Affecting Obstetric Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Cold-Knife and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization Due to CIN 2 or CIN 3.
    Obut M; İskender CT; Kından A; Yücel Çelik Ö; Bucak M; Kayıkçıoğlu F; Tokgöz Çakır B; Koç S; Çakır C; Çelen Ş; Çağlar AT; Engin Üstün Y
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38063009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
    Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
    Huang LW; Hwang JL
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double-LEEP Cone Procedure as an Alternative to Cold-Knife Conization in Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
    Husseinzadeh N; Retting WL
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 25950891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between cervical excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and obstetrical outcome.
    Monti M; D'Aniello D; Scopelliti A; Tibaldi V; Santangelo G; Colagiovanni V; Giannini A; DI Donato V; Palaia I; Perniola G; Giancotti A; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
    Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):233-246. PubMed ID: 33140628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness and risk of preterm birth of local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage IA1 cervical cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Athanasiou A; Veroniki AA; Efthimiou O; Kalliala I; Naci H; Bowden S; Paraskevaidi M; Arbyn M; Lyons D; Martin-Hirsch P; Bennett P; Paraskevaidis E; Salanti G; Kyrgiou M
    Lancet Oncol; 2022 Aug; 23(8):1097-1108. PubMed ID: 35835138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy outcome after the treatment of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Liu Y; Qiu HF; Tang Y; Chen J; Lv J
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2014; 77(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 24752130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
    Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and safety of cryotherapy, cold cone or thermocoagulation compared to LEEP as a therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Systematic review.
    Hurtado-Roca Y; Becerra-Chauca N; Malca M
    Rev Saude Publica; 2020; 54():27. PubMed ID: 32187314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold coagulation for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A two center cohort study.
    Kim HS; Kwon JE; Kim JH; Kim A; Lee NR; Kim M; Lee M; Suh DH; Kim YB
    Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2017 Mar; 60(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 28344962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of cold knife cone biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ: What is the gold standard?
    Munro A; Leung Y; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Semmens J; Codde J; Williams V; O'Leary P; Steel N; Cohen P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 May; 137(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 25769659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of persistent or recurrent neoplasia in conservatively treated women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative histological margins.
    Munro A; Codde J; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Semmens JB; Cohen PA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28181670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure versus Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    D'Alessandro P; Arduino B; Borgo M; Saccone G; Venturella R; Di Cello A; Zullo F
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2018; 7(4):145-151. PubMed ID: 30306032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of cervical conisation on pregnancy outcome: a meta-analysis.
    Zhuang H; Hong S; Zheng L; Zhang L; Zhuang X; Wei H; Yang Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 29884103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.