These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27419331)

  • 1. Screening for Breast Cancer.
    Croswell J; Owings J
    Am Fam Physician; 2016 Jul; 94(2):143-4. PubMed ID: 27419331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Revealing Oz behind the curtain: USPSTF screening mammography guidelines and the hot air balloon.
    Javitt MC; Hendrick RE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):289-90. PubMed ID: 20099408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for early detection of breast cancer: overdiagnosis versus suboptimal patient management.
    Gur D; Sumkin JH
    Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):327-8. PubMed ID: 23882095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluating the benefits of mammographic breast cancer screening].
    Kullmann T; Misset JL
    Orv Hetil; 2010 Aug; 151(35):1409-14. PubMed ID: 20719714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should breast cancer screening programs routinely measure mammographic density?
    Stone J
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 62(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 29624213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine reporting of mammographic density from screening mammograms.
    Farshid G
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Dec; 87(12):965-967. PubMed ID: 29205822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast Density, Risk of Breast Cancer, and Screening Mammography in Women 75 Years and Older.
    Tuite CM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2124385. PubMed ID: 34436613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
    Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast-density legislation--practical considerations.
    Slanetz PJ; Freer PE; Birdwell RL
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Feb; 372(7):593-5. PubMed ID: 25671249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Moseley TW
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):362-79. PubMed ID: 27101241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient preferences in breast cancer screening: lessons to be learned from the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Sadigh G; Kelly AM; Fagerlin A; Carlos RC
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1333-6. PubMed ID: 21835650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The contribution of mammography screening to breast cancer incidence trends in the United States: an updated age-period-cohort model.
    Gangnon RE; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Alagoz O; Weedon-Fekjær H; Holford TR; Trentham-Dietz A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Jun; 24(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 25787716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Point: The New England Journal of Medicine article suggesting overdiagnosis from mammography screening is scientifically incorrect and should be withdrawn.
    Kopans DB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 May; 10(5):317-9; discussion 323. PubMed ID: 23542028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices.
    Morris E; Feig SA; Drexler M; Lehman C
    Popul Health Manag; 2015 Sep; 18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-11. PubMed ID: 26414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time trends in breast cancer screening rates in the OECD countries.
    Saika K; Sobue T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2011 Apr; 41(4):591-2. PubMed ID: 21447696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Towards risk-stratified population breast cancer screening: more than mammographic density.
    Hopper JL; Nguyen TL
    Med J Aust; 2021 Oct; 215(8):350-351. PubMed ID: 34532866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography in younger women: the dilemma of diminishing returns.
    Calonge N
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):668-9. PubMed ID: 20439837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of the New Jersey Breast Density Law on Imaging and Intervention Volumes and Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
    Sanders LM; King AB; Goodman KS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 27318582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Full-Field Digital Mammography in Recall Rates and Cancer Detection Rates.
    Procasco M
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):349-51. PubMed ID: 26721849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.