These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27420292)

  • 1. Do different standard plate counting (IDF/ISSO or AOAC) methods interfere in the conversion of individual bacteria counts to colony forming units in raw milk?
    Cassoli LD; Lima WJ; Esguerra JC; Da Silva J; Machado PF; Mourão GB
    J Appl Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 121(4):1052-8. PubMed ID: 27420292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the application of an automated electronic milk analyzer for the enumeration of total bacteria in raw goat milk.
    Ramsahoi L; Gao A; Fabri M; Odumeru JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3279-87. PubMed ID: 21700012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical note: enumeration of mesophilic aerobes in milk: evaluation of standard official protocols and Petrifilm aerobic count plates.
    Freitas R; Nero LA; Carvalho AF
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jul; 92(7):3069-73. PubMed ID: 19528584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bacteriological quality of raw milk used for production of a Brazilian farmstead raw milk cheese.
    Costa Sobrinho Pde S; Marçal de Faria CA; Silva Pinheiro J; Gonçalves de Almeida H; Vieira Pires C; Silva Santos A
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2012 Feb; 9(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 22217108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MC-Media Pad ACplus™ for Enumeration of Aerobic Counts in a Variety of Foods.
    Teramura H; Betts G; Chen Y; Brodsky M; Salfinger Y
    J AOAC Int; 2018 May; 101(3):769-782. PubMed ID: 29054139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semi-automated direct epifluorescent filter technique for total bacterial count in raw milk.
    Hermida M; Taboada M; Menéndez S; Rodríguez-Otero JL
    J AOAC Int; 2000; 83(6):1345-8. PubMed ID: 11128136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of microfiltration to improve fluid milk quality.
    Elwell MW; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Mar; 89 Suppl 1():E20-30. PubMed ID: 16527875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limitations of on-site dairy farm regulatory debits as milk quality predictors.
    Borneman DL; Stiegert K; Ingham S
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1526-38. PubMed ID: 25597965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short communication: effect of storage and preservation on total bacterial counts determined by automated flow cytometry in bulk tank goat milk.
    Sierra D; Sánchez A; Contreras A; Luengo C; Corrales JC; de la Fe C; Guirao I; Morales CT; Gonzalo C
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):4841-5. PubMed ID: 19762799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of various dairy packaging materials on the shelf life and flavor of pasteurized milk.
    Simon M; Hansen AP
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Apr; 84(4):767-73. PubMed ID: 11352151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of microbiological testing on subsequent mid-infrared milk component analysis of the same milk sample.
    Wojciechowski KL; Melilli C; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Sep; 97(9):5885-97. PubMed ID: 25022674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbiological quality of raw milk produced in Estonia.
    Stulova I; Adamberg S; Krisciunaite T; Kampura M; Blank L; Laht TM
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2010 Dec; 51(6):683-90. PubMed ID: 20973807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
    Augustin JC; Carlier V
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simple detection of small amounts of Pseudomonas cells in milk by using a microfluidic device.
    Yamaguchi N; Ohba H; Nasu M
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 43(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 17083709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aerobic bacterial, coliform, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus counts of raw and processed milk from selected smallholder dairy farms of Zimbabwe.
    Mhone TA; Matope G; Saidi PT
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2011 Dec; 151(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 21944662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of raw milk quality on fluid milk shelf life.
    Barbano DM; Ma Y; Santos MV
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Mar; 89 Suppl 1():E15-9. PubMed ID: 16527874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A flow cytometric technique for quantification and differentiation of bacteria in bulk tank milk.
    Holm C; Mathiasen T; Jespersen L
    J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 97(5):935-41. PubMed ID: 15479408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of calf milk pasteurization systems on 6 Pennsylvania dairy farms.
    Elizondo-Salazar JA; Jones CM; Heinrichs AJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5509-13. PubMed ID: 20965367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential for broad applications of flow cytometry and fluorescence techniques in microbiological and somatic cell analyses of milk.
    Gunasekera TS; Veal DA; Attfield PV
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2003 Aug; 85(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 12878385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence of thermoduric bacteria and spores on 10 Midwest dairy farms.
    Buehner KP; Anand S; Djira GD; Garcia A
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Nov; 97(11):6777-84. PubMed ID: 25200773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.