BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27421276)

  • 1. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Brox JI; Solberg TK; Storheim K; Rekeland F; Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):404-413. PubMed ID: 27421276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Ahmad S; Hamad A; Bhalla A; Turner S; Balain B; Jaffray D
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):414-419. PubMed ID: 27272494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Försth P; Ólafsson G; Carlsson T; Frost A; Borgström F; Fritzell P; Öhagen P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1413-23. PubMed ID: 27074066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Gibson JNA; Depreitere B; Pflugmacher R; Schnake KJ; Fielding LC; Alamin TF; Goffin J
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. PubMed ID: 25579423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries.
    Lønne G; Fritzell P; Hägg O; Nordvall D; Gerdhem P; Lagerbäck T; Andersen M; Eiskjaer S; Gehrchen M; Jacobs W; van Hooff ML; Solberg TK
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 29792994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression Alone vs Decompression Plus Instrumented Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Sep; 3(9):e2015015. PubMed ID: 32910195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Hermansen E; Fagerland MW; Storheim K; Brox JI; Solberg T; Rekeland F; Franssen E; Weber C; Brisby H; Grundnes O; Algaard KRH; Böker T; Banitalebi H; Indrekvam K; Hellum C;
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Aug; 385(6):526-538. PubMed ID: 34347953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients.
    Sigmundsson FG; Jönsson B; Strömqvist B
    Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):638-46. PubMed ID: 25450653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chang W; Yuwen P; Zhu Y; Wei N; Feng C; Zhang Y; Chen W
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 May; 137(5):637-650. PubMed ID: 28361467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of a Decision-Making Protocol for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis with Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Staartjes VE; Schröder ML
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 110():e355-e361. PubMed ID: 29133000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumental fusion the NORDSTEN degenerative spondylolisthesis trial (NORDSTEN-DS); study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Austevoll IM; Hermansen E; Fagerland M; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Lønne G; Indrekvam K; Aaen J; Grundnes O; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30611229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective versus multi-segmental decompression and fusion for multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with single-segment degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sun W; Xue C; Tang XY; Feng H; Yuan F; Guo KJ; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30755227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.