These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
810 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27421815)
1. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors. Han JP; Lee TH; Hong SJ; Kim HK; Noh HM; Lee YN; Choi HJ J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS; Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles. Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. El Chafic AH; Loren D; Siddiqui A; Mounzer R; Cosgrove N; Kowalski T Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Sep; 86(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 28131864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Wang J; Wu X; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Li Y; Wang Y; Cheng B Trials; 2016 Apr; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study. Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling using core biopsy needle as a percutaneous biopsy rescue for diagnosis of solid liver mass: Combined histological-cytological analysis. Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Lee TH; Cha SW; Kim SG; Kim YS J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1161-6. PubMed ID: 25684303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study. Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions. Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Strand DS; Jeffus SK; Sauer BG; Wang AY; Stelow EB; Shami VM Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Sep; 42(9):751-8. PubMed ID: 24550162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial. Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and ProCore biopsy in sampling pancreatic and intra-abdominal masses. Dwyer J; Pantanowitz L; Ohori NP; Pai RK; Vrbin C; Brand RE; Monaco SE Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb; 124(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 26430767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better? Li J; Feng J; Gao S; Wang W; Huang L; Yi S; Xu H; Ding XW J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Apr; 43(4):761-770. PubMed ID: 38167820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study. de Moura DTH; McCarty TR; Jirapinyo P; Ribeiro IB; Flumignan VK; Najdawai F; Ryou M; Lee LS; Thompson CC Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Jul; 92(1):108-119.e3. PubMed ID: 32105712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy for the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors larger than 2 cm. Lee JH; Cho CJ; Park YS; Ahn JY; Kim DH; Na HK; Choi KD; Song HJ; Lee GH; Jung HY Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(4):486-93. PubMed ID: 26061486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Cheng B; Zhang Y; Chen Q; Sun B; Deng Z; Shan H; Dou L; Wang J; Li Y; Yang X; Jiang T; Xu G; Wang G Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1314-1321. PubMed ID: 28733257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]