These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27421975)

  • 1. Using propensity score matching to construct experimental stimuli.
    Huber S; Dietrich JF; Nagengast B; Moeller K
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):1107-1119. PubMed ID: 27421975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity score matching: a conceptual review for radiology researchers.
    Baek S; Park SH; Won E; Park YR; Kim HJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 25741190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of the Propensity Score Matching Paradox in Pharmacoepidemiology.
    Ripollone JE; Huybrechts KF; Rothman KJ; Ferguson RE; Franklin JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 187(9):1951-1961. PubMed ID: 29750409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review.
    Austin PC
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2008 Sep; 1(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 20031790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research.
    Barnieh L; James MT; Zhang J; Hemmelgarn BR
    J Nephrol; 2011; 24(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 21404223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity scores as a basis for equating groups: basic principles and application in clinical treatment outcome research.
    West SG; Cham H; Thoemmes F; Renneberg B; Schulze J; Weiler M
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2014 Oct; 82(5):906-19. PubMed ID: 24708350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propensity Score Matching: The 'Devil is in the Details' Where More May Be Hidden than You Know.
    Reiffel JA
    Am J Med; 2020 Feb; 133(2):178-181. PubMed ID: 31618617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Propensity score matching in SPSS].
    Huang F; DU C; Sun M; Ning B; Luo Y; An S
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1597-601. PubMed ID: 26607082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variance estimation when using propensity-score matching with replacement with survival or time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC; Cafri G
    Stat Med; 2020 May; 39(11):1623-1640. PubMed ID: 32109319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propensity Score Analysis in Non-Randomized Experimental Designs: An Overview and a Tutorial Using R Software.
    Kim H
    New Dir Child Adolesc Dev; 2019 Sep; 2019(167):65-89. PubMed ID: 31507059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The propensity score method and it's application].
    Huang LL; Chen F
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 53(7):752-756. PubMed ID: 31288349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of the performance of different methods for propensity score matched subgroup analyses and a summary of their application in peer-reviewed research studies.
    Wang SV; He M; Jin Y; Wyss R; Shin H; Ma Y; Keeton S; Fireman B; Karami S; Major JM; Schneeweiss S; Gagne JJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1507-1512. PubMed ID: 28984001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive propensity score procedure improves matching in prospective observational trials.
    Weber D; Uhlmann L; Schönenberger S; Kieser M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):150. PubMed ID: 31311500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of triple therapy with direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C genotype 1 infection: application of propensity score matching in a national HCV treatment registry.
    Gray E; Pasta DJ; Norris S; O'Leary A;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Apr; 17(1):288. PubMed ID: 28424064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score interval matching: using bootstrap confidence intervals for accommodating estimation errors of propensity scores.
    Pan W; Bai H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 26215035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Results of a Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Efficacy of Abdominal Fascia and Skin Closure Using PDS® Plus Antibacterial (Polydioxanone) Sutures on the Incidence of Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infections after Gastroenterologic Surgery.
    Takeno S; Yamashita K; Yamashita Y; Yamada K; Hoshino S; Yamauchi Y; Noritomi T
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2016 Feb; 17(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 26484972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity score matching with clustered data. An application to the estimation of the impact of caesarean section on the Apgar score.
    Arpino B; Cannas M
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2074-91. PubMed ID: 26833893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the acute care surgery literature: avoiding the pitfalls and proposing a set of reporting guidelines.
    Zakrison TL; Austin PC; McCredie VA
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 28342097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.