These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
652 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27422237)
1. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT. Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns. Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques. Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the Internal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Using Micro-CT. Alfaro DP; Ruse ND; Carvalho RM; Wyatt CC J Prosthodont; 2015 Jul; 24(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 25753858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies. Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique. Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques. Abduljawad DE; Rayyan MR J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):707-714. PubMed ID: 35294099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Methodology: A Three-Dimensional Analysis. Mostafa NZ; Ruse ND; Ford NL; Carvalho RM; Wyatt CCL J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 28833920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns: Press vs. CAD/CAM. Azar B; Eckert S; Kunkela J; Ingr T; Mounajjed R Braz Oral Res; 2018; 32():e001. PubMed ID: 29364328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique. Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Fabrication Technique on the Marginal Discrepancy and Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: An In Vitro Study. Sadid-Zadeh R; Li R; Miller LM; Simon M J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1005-1010. PubMed ID: 30628147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after conventional and digital impressions. Dauti R; Cvikl B; Lilaj B; Heimel P; Moritz A; Schedle A J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 29891419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fit Accuracy of Pressed and Milled Lithium Disilicate Inlays Fabricated From Conventional Impressions or a Laboratory-Based Digital Workflow. Homsy F; Bottin M; Özcan M; Majzoub Z Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 30779496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras. de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]