These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27423430)

  • 1. Cost and benefit estimates of partially-automated vehicle collision avoidance technologies.
    Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):104-15. PubMed ID: 27423430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Net-societal and net-private benefits of some existing vehicle crash avoidance technologies.
    Khan A; Harper CD; Hendrickson CT; Samaras C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():207-216. PubMed ID: 30772676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems.
    Spicer R; Vahabaghaie A; Bahouth G; Drees L; Martinez von Bülow R; Baur P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential occupant injury reduction in the U.S. vehicle fleet for lane departure warning-equipped vehicles in single-vehicle crashes.
    Kusano K; Gorman TI; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S157-64. PubMed ID: 25307382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motorcycle crashes potentially preventable by three crash avoidance technologies on passenger vehicles.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):513-517. PubMed ID: 29624413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems.
    Yue L; Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Wang L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():55-64. PubMed ID: 29654988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies.
    Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov; 49():338-46. PubMed ID: 22763402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2016 Feb; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the real-world safety effect of a lane change driver support system and characteristics of lane change crashes based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S104-S111. PubMed ID: 29584482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A trial of retrofitted advisory collision avoidance technology in government fleet vehicles.
    Thompson JP; Mackenzie JRR; Dutschke JK; Baldock MRJ; Raftery SJ; Wall J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():34-40. PubMed ID: 29544135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forward collision warning system impact.
    Hubele N; Kennedy K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S78-S83. PubMed ID: 30001148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The real-world safety potential of connected vehicle technology.
    Doecke S; Grant A; Anderson RW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S31-5. PubMed ID: 26027973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of blind spot monitoring systems on police-reported lane-change crashes.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(6):615-622. PubMed ID: 29927678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive target populations for current active safety systems using national crash databases.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(7):753-61. PubMed ID: 24433115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of lane departure warning on police-reported crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    J Safety Res; 2018 Sep; 66():61-70. PubMed ID: 30121111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Narrative text analysis to identify technologies to prevent motor vehicle crashes: examples from military vehicles.
    Pollack KM; Yee N; Canham-Chervak M; Rossen L; Bachynski KE; Baker SP
    J Safety Res; 2013 Feb; 44():45-9. PubMed ID: 23398704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.