347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27423511)
1. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
Modi N
Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness and practice variation in neonatal care.
Lagatta J; Uhing M; Panepinto J
Clin Perinatol; 2014 Dec; 41(4):833-45. PubMed ID: 25459777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.
Shah BR; Drozda J; Peterson ED
Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20598966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research.
Chalkidou K; Tunis S; Whicher D; Fowler R; Zwarenstein M
Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):436-46. PubMed ID: 22752634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of observational investigations in comparative effectiveness research.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 21138497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Sports Medicine Research: Identifying Effective Treatment Interventions Through Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Lam KC; Bacon CEW; Sauers EL; Bay RC
J Athl Train; 2020 Mar; 55(3):217-228. PubMed ID: 31618071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
Sox HC; Goodman SN
Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Observational study designs for comparative effectiveness research: an alternative approach to close evidence gaps in head-and-neck cancer.
Goulart BH; Ramsey SD; Parvathaneni U
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jan; 88(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 24331656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY
Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma.
Krishnan JA; Schatz M; Apter AJ
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2011 Jan; 127(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 20855111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Which research is needed to support clinical decision-making on integrative medicine? Can comparative effectiveness research close the gap?].
Witt CM; Huang WJ; Lao L; Berman BM
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 33(8):1030-5. PubMed ID: 24325048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.
Blajchman MA; Carson JL; Eikelboom JW; Heddle NM; Lacroix J; Lauer MS; Platt R; Tilley B; Triulzi D; Vickers AJ; Yusuf S; Glynn S; Mondoro TH; Wagner E
Transfusion; 2012 Jun; 52(6):1363-78. PubMed ID: 22486525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invited article: comparative effectiveness research, evidence-based medicine, and the AAN.
French JA; England JD
Neurology; 2010 Aug; 75(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 20697109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
Kupersmith J; Ommaya AK
Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e3-7. PubMed ID: 21184864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
