These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27423925)

  • 1. Conclusion: Agency in the face of complexity and the future of assumption-aware evaluation practice.
    Morrow N; Nkwake AM
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():154-160. PubMed ID: 27423925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volume overview: Working with assumptions. Existing and emerging approaches for improved program design, monitoring and evaluation.
    Nkwake AM; Morrow N
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():94-96. PubMed ID: 27329488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assumption-aware tools and agency; an interrogation of the primary artifacts of the program evaluation and design profession in working with complex evaluands and complex contexts.
    Morrow N; Nkwake AM
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():141-153. PubMed ID: 27340048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assumptions at the philosophical and programmatic levels in evaluation.
    Mertens DM
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():102-108. PubMed ID: 27340047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clarifying concepts and categories of assumptions for use in evaluation.
    Nkwake AM; Morrow N
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():97-101. PubMed ID: 27324287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When does a conceptual framework become a theory? Reflections from an accidental theorist.
    Cousins JB
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():67-70. PubMed ID: 22497774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interfacing theories of program with theories of evaluation for advancing evaluation practice: Reductionism, systems thinking, and pragmatic synthesis.
    Chen HT
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():109-118. PubMed ID: 27346429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Logic and evaluation theory.
    Greene JC
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():71-3. PubMed ID: 22465701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Logic models: a useful way to study theories of evaluation practice?
    Miller RL
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():77-80. PubMed ID: 22445548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying complexity theory: a review to inform evaluation design.
    Walton M
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Aug; 45():119-26. PubMed ID: 24780280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What can practitioners learn from theorists' logic models?
    Gargani J
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():81-8. PubMed ID: 22469341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Making sense of the emerging conversation in evaluation about systems thinking and complexity science.
    Gates EF
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():62-73. PubMed ID: 27591941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causal inferences on the effectiveness of complex social programs: Navigating assumptions, sources of complexity and evaluation design challenges.
    Chatterji M
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Dec; 59():128-140. PubMed ID: 27473589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visualizing context through theory deconstruction: a content analysis of three bodies of evaluation theory literature.
    Vo AT
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():44-52. PubMed ID: 22469338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ten steps to making evaluation matter.
    Sridharan S; Nakaima A
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 May; 34(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 20970856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
    Brousselle A; Champagne F
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Feb; 34(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 20541262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models.
    Gugiu PC; Rodríguez-Campos L
    Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 17905433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agent-based modeling as a tool for program design and evaluation.
    Lawlor JA; McGirr S
    Eval Program Plann; 2017 Dec; 65():131-138. PubMed ID: 28865334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories.
    Hansen M; Alkin MC; Wallace TL
    Eval Program Plann; 2013 Jun; 38():34-43. PubMed ID: 22465702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting a theory of negotiation: the utility of Markiewicz (2005) proposed six principles.
    McDonald D
    Eval Program Plann; 2008 Aug; 31(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 18486972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.