These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27424111)

  • 1. Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.
    Nevis IF; Vali B; Higgins C; Dhalla I; Urbach D; Bernardini MQ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 27424111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
    Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
    Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.
    Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park DA; Yun JE; Kim SW; Lee SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 27546015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
    Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
    Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
    Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome of robot-assisted surgery for stage IA endometrial cancer compared to open and laparoscopic surgeries: a retrospective study at a single institution.
    Ikebuchi A; Komatsu H; Yamamoto K; Okawa M; Hikino K; Iida Y; Hosokawa M; Sawada M; Kudoh A; Sato S; Harada T; Taniguchi F
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):133. PubMed ID: 38520654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution.
    Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT
    Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 25683998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
    Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
    Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xie W; Cao D; Yang J; Shen K; Zhao L
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 142(10):2173-83. PubMed ID: 27217038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
    Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese).
    Dinoi G; Tarantino V; Bizzarri N; Perrone E; Capasso I; Giannarelli D; Querleu D; Giuliano MC; Fagotti A; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 May; 34(5):773-776. PubMed ID: 38326228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.