209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27425587)
1. Multimodality imaging for the diagnosis and assessment of aortic stenosis severity.
Davin L; Dulgheru R; Bernard A; Marchetta S; Piérard LA; Lancellotti P
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2016 Oct; 14(10):1177-88. PubMed ID: 27425587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Do We Reconcile Echocardiography, Computed Tomography, and Hybrid Imaging in Assessing Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity?
Delgado V; Clavel MA; Hahn RT; Gillam L; Bax J; Sengupta PP; Pibarot P
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 12(2):267-282. PubMed ID: 30732722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multimodality Imaging in Aortic Stenosis: Beyond the Valve - Focusing on the Myocardium.
Gaznabi S; Miranda J; Lorenzatti D; Piña P; Balasubramanian SS; Desai D; Desai A; Ho EC; Scotti A; Gongora CA; Schenone AL; Garcia MJ; Latib A; Parwani P; Slipczuk L
Cardiol Clin; 2024 Aug; 42(3):433-446. PubMed ID: 38910026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vascular Imaging Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR): Why and How?
Caruso D; Rosenberg RD; De Cecco CN; Mangold S; Wichmann JL; Varga-Szemes A; Steinberg DH; Laghi A; Schoepf UJ
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2016 Feb; 18(2):14. PubMed ID: 26768740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis.
Tandon A; Grayburn PA
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):184-95. PubMed ID: 23489532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of aortic stenosis.
Singh A; McCann GP
Heart; 2019 Mar; 105(6):489-497. PubMed ID: 30322845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Planimetry of the Orifice Area in Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Phase-Contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Abe H; Iguchi N; Utanohara Y; Takada K; Hen Y; Machida H; Takeda N; Sumiyoshi T
Int Heart J; 2018 Jan; 59(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 29279525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
Barone-Rochette G; Piérard S; Seldrum S; de Meester de Ravenstein C; Melchior J; Maes F; Pouleur AC; Vancraeynest D; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low flow, low gradient severe aortic stenosis: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.
Orwat S; Kaleschke G; Kerckhoff G; Radke R; Baumgartner H
EuroIntervention; 2013 Sep; 9 Suppl():S38-42. PubMed ID: 24025956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic valve stenosis-multimodality assessment with PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Tzolos E; Andrews JP; Dweck MR
Br J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 93(1113):20190688. PubMed ID: 31647323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Severe Aortic Stenosis With a Large Infra-aortic Annular Aneurysm of the Ventricular Septum Treated With CoreValve.
Naganuma T; Kawamoto H; Yabushita H; Nakao T; Nakamura S
Can J Cardiol; 2017 May; 33(5):688.e13-688.e15. PubMed ID: 28318899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Multimodality Imaging for Planning and Follow-up of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Soon J; Pibarot P; Blanke P; Ohana M; Leipsic J
Can J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1110-1123. PubMed ID: 28666614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-operative aortic valve implantation evaluation: multimodality imaging.
Delgado V; Schuijf JD; Bax JJ
EuroIntervention; 2010 May; 6 Suppl G():G38-47. PubMed ID: 20542827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis: a review of diagnostic modalities and hemodynamics.
Saikrishnan N; Kumar G; Sawaya FJ; Lerakis S; Yoganathan AP
Circulation; 2014 Jan; 129(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 24421359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Severity: A Multimodality Approach.
Ternacle J; Clavel MA
Cardiol Clin; 2020 Feb; 38(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 31753172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Role of multimodality imaging in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation].
Bertella E; Mushtaq S; Andreini D; Pontone G
Recenti Prog Med; 2013 Sep; 104(9):498-505. PubMed ID: 24121948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Moderate aortic stenosis: Navigating the uncharted.
Caprio MV; De Donno F; Bisaccia G; Mantini C; Di Baldassarre A; Gallina S; Khanji MY; Ricci F
Echocardiography; 2024 Jun; 41(6):e15859. PubMed ID: 38853624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in Aortic Valve and Left Ventricular Parameters Related to the Severity of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Song I; Ko SM; Yi JG; Chee HK; Kim JS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170939. PubMed ID: 28129367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates.
Paelinck BP; Van Herck PL; Rodrigus I; Claeys MJ; Laborde JC; Parizel PM; Vrints CJ; Bosmans JM
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 21529729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
