BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27425587)

  • 21. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
    Levy F; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Hugues N; Alexandrescu C; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cardiac Imaging for Assessing Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Clavel MA; Burwash IG; Pibarot P
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 10(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 28183438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of aortic valve area in aortic valve stenosis.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Buck T; Erbel R
    Herz; 2006 Oct; 31(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 17072778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of jet eccentricity in generating disproportionately elevated transaortic pressure gradients in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Abbas AE; Franey LM; Lester S; Raff G; Gallagher MJ; Hanzel G; Safian RD; Pibarot P
    Echocardiography; 2015 Feb; 32(2):372-82. PubMed ID: 25138664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of aortic valve area measured by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography.
    Bruder O; Jochims M; Hunold P; Jensen C; Forsting M; Sabin GV; Barkhausen J; Schlosser T
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 19452337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as accurate as echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis?
    Wong S; Spina R; Toemoe S; Dhital K
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 22(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 26718319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Diagnosis and assessment of severity of aortic valve stenosis].
    Franke A; Kühl HP
    Herz; 2006 Oct; 31(7):644-9. PubMed ID: 17072777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Image diagnosis of aortic valve disease: an update].
    Gómez M
    Medwave; 2016 Sep; 16 Suppl 4():e6530. PubMed ID: 27636239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of dual-source computed tomography for the quantification of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis versus transthoracic echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessment.
    Ropers D; Ropers U; Marwan M; Schepis T; Pflederer T; Wechsel M; Klinghammer L; Flachskampf FA; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 19932793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The assessment of aortic stenosis: echocardiography and beyond.
    Chambers JB
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2016 Mar; 77(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 26961441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic characterization of aortic annulus geometry and morphology with multimodality imaging: predictive value for aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Masri A; Schoenhagen P; Svensson L; Kapadia SR; Griffin BP; Tuzcu EM; Desai MY
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jun; 147(6):1847-54. PubMed ID: 23870156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multimodality and Fusion Imaging in Percutaneous Therapy of Tricuspid Regurgitation.
    Li CH; Millan X; Capellades H; Danduch L; Serra A; Arzamendi D
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2019 May; 72(5):421-422. PubMed ID: 31007167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis by different imaging modalities.
    Guner A; Havan N; Gunduz S; Akgun T; Guvendi B; Kahveci G
    Echocardiography; 2017 Sep; 34(9):1376-1378. PubMed ID: 28681443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Non-Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Computed Tomography Angiography for Aortic Annular Sizing Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Wang J; Jagasia DH; Kondapally YR; Herrmann HC; Han Y
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 29(7):239-245. PubMed ID: 28570260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemodynamic assessment of severe aortic stenosis: MRI evaluation of dynamic changes of vena contracta.
    Weininger M; Sagmeister F; Herrmann S; Lange V; Schoepf UJ; Beissert M; Voelker W; Koestler H; Hahn D; Weidemann F; Beer M
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21102347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
    Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multimodality Imaging Strategies for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis: Viewpoint of the Heart Valve Clinic International Database (HAVEC) Group.
    Dulgheru R; Pibarot P; Sengupta PP; Piérard LA; Rosenhek R; Magne J; Donal E; Bernard A; Fattouch K; Cosyns B; Vannan M; Gillam L; Lancellotti P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Feb; 9(2):e004352. PubMed ID: 26863917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Altiok E; Frick M; Meyer CG; Al Ateah G; Napp A; Kirschfink A; Almalla M; Lotfi S; Becker M; Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Role of Imaging in Measuring Disease Progression and Assessing Novel Therapies in Aortic Stenosis.
    Doris MK; Everett RJ; Shun-Shin M; Clavel MA; Dweck MR
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jan; 12(1):185-197. PubMed ID: 30621990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.