997 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27427182)
1. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
Uloza V; Latoszek BBV; Ulozaite-Staniene N; Petrauskas T; Maryn Y
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.
Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.
Kankare E; Barsties V Latoszek B; Maryn Y; Asikainen M; Rorarius E; Vilpas S; Ilomäki I; Tyrmi J; Rantala L; Laukkanen AM
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 30720373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.
Yeşilli-Puzella G; Tadıhan-Özkan E; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):736.e25-736.e32. PubMed ID: 32962941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.
Barsties V Latoszek B; Lehnert B; Janotte B
J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):157.e17-157.e25. PubMed ID: 30217485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity.
Barsties B; Maryn Y
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jul; 125(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 26951063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
Kim GH; von Latoszek BB; Lee YW
J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
Faham M; Laukkanen AM; Ikävalko T; Rantala L; Geneid A; Holmqvist-Jämsén S; Ruusuvirta K; Pirilä S
J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Acoustic Breathiness Index: Analysis With Different Speech Material in the Brazilian Portuguese.
Englert M; Lima L; Behlau M
J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):810.e11-810.e17. PubMed ID: 31005448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.
Lee JM; Roy N; Peterson E; Merrill RM
J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):515.e1-515.e13. PubMed ID: 28739333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
Vogel AP; Wardrop MI; Folker JE; Synofzik M; Corben LA; Delatycki MB; Awan SN
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
Lu FL; Matteson S
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores.
Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM
J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity.
Kim GH; Lee YW; Bae IH; Park HJ; Lee BJ; Kwon SB
J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):489.e11-489.e19. PubMed ID: 30527706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
