204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27430185)
1. National Trends in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Extremely Young Patients: A Focus on Bearing Surface Usage From 2009 to 2012.
Rajaee SS; Theriault RV; Pevear ME; Smith EL
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):63-8. PubMed ID: 27430185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National trends in primary total hip arthroplasty in extremely young patients: a focus on bearing surface usage.
Rajaee SS; Trofa D; Matzkin E; Smith E
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Dec; 27(10):1870-8. PubMed ID: 22658430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Continuing to Change? 2007-2015 Usage in a Large Database Cohort.
Bedard NA; Burnett RA; DeMik DE; Gao Y; Liu SS; Callaghan JJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3777-3781. PubMed ID: 28887024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Trends in the United States From 2007 to 2014: The Rise of Ceramic on Polyethylene.
Heckmann ND; Sivasundaram L; Stefl MD; Kang HP; Basler ET; Lieberman JR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1757-1763.e1. PubMed ID: 29429883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Epidemiology and National Trends of Bearing Surface Usage in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Korea.
Yoon PW; Yoo JJ; Kim Y; Yoo S; Lee S; Kim HJ
Clin Orthop Surg; 2016 Mar; 8(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 26929796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States.
Bozic KJ; Kurtz S; Lau E; Ong K; Chiu V; Vail TP; Rubash HE; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jul; 91(7):1614-20. PubMed ID: 19571083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total Hip Arthroplasty: National Bearing Surface Trends for 20- to 50-Year-Old Patients.
Davila-Castrodad IM; Remily EA; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Acevedo YS; Barg V; Delanois RE
Surg Technol Int; 2020 May; 36():418-425. PubMed ID: 32359165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is There a Cardiotoxicity Associated With Metallic Head Hip Prostheses? A Cohort Study in the French National Health Insurance Databases.
Lassalle M; Colas S; Rudnichi A; Zureik M; Dray-Spira R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1441-1451. PubMed ID: 29698302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
Pitto RP; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
Milošev I; Kovač S; Trebše R; Levašič V; Pišot V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Oct; 94(19):1756-63. PubMed ID: 23032586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty.
Nam D; Barrack T; Johnson SR; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2115-22. PubMed ID: 26911973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Midterm Prospective Comparative Analysis of 2 Hard-on-Hard Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasty Designs.
Martin JR; Jennings JM; Watters TS; Levy DL; Miner TM; Dennis DA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1820-1825. PubMed ID: 29429884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation?
Pitto RP; Garland M; Sedel L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3790-5. PubMed ID: 26070775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are Ceramic Bearings Becoming Cost-Effective for All Patients?
Kurtz SM; Lau EC; Baykal D; Odum SM; Springer BD; Fehring TK
J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 29336858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
Varnum C
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Migaud H; Putman S; Kern G; Isida R; Girard J; Ramdane N; Delaunay CP; Hamadouche M;
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2190-9. PubMed ID: 27255729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Postoperative Complications Following Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty With Other Hip Bearings in Medicare Population.
Kleeman LT; Bala A; Penrose CT; Seyler TM; Wellman SS; Bolognesi MP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1826-1832. PubMed ID: 29510952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are Ceramic Bearings Becoming Cost-Effective for All Patients Within a 90-Day Bundled Payment Period?
Kurtz SM; Lau E; Baykal D; Odum SM; Springer BD; Fehring TK
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 30799268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.
Higuchi Y; Hasegawa Y; Seki T; Komatsu D; Ishiguro N
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1246-1250. PubMed ID: 26781388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing really superior to ceramic-on-polyethylene for primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Si HB; Zeng Y; Cao F; Pei FX; Shen B
Hip Int; 2015; 25(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 25684252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
