These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27431327)
1. A comparison of health utility scores calculated using United Kingdom and Canadian preference weights in persons with alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. Fang M; Oremus M; Tarride JE; Raina P; Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Jul; 14(1):105. PubMed ID: 27431327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health utility scores in Alzheimer's disease: differences based on calculation with American and Canadian preference weights. Oremus M; Tarride JE; Clayton N; ; Raina P Value Health; 2014; 17(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24438720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can the general public use vignettes to discriminate between Alzheimer's disease health states? Oremus M; Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K BMC Geriatr; 2016 Feb; 16():36. PubMed ID: 26842500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of EQ-5D index scores using the UK, US, and Japan preference weights in a Thai sample with type 2 diabetes. Sakthong P; Charoenvisuthiwongs R; Shabunthom R Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2008 Sep; 6():71. PubMed ID: 18811935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Empirical research of measuring elderly health utility in the outskirts of Beijing by using European quality of life 5-dimensions]. Wu YQ; Liu K; Tang X; Cao Y; Wang JW; Li N; Liu JJ; Yu LP; Xu HT; Liu WJ; Wen SS; Hu YH; Li K Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Jun; 44(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 22692310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. US and UK versions of the EQ-5D preference weights: does choice of preference weights make a difference? Huang IC; Willke RJ; Atkinson MJ; Lenderking WR; Frangakis C; Wu AW Qual Life Res; 2007 Aug; 16(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17415683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does being a retired or employed caregiver affect the association between behaviours in Alzheimer's disease and caregivers' health-related quality-of-life? Majoni M; Oremus M BMC Res Notes; 2017 Dec; 10(1):766. PubMed ID: 29268786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of EQ-5D-3L health utility scores using five country-specific tariffs in a rural population aged 45-69 years in Hua county, Henan province, China. Wang H; Cao C; Guo C; He Y; Li F; Xu R; Liu M; Liu Z; Pan Y; Liu F; Liu Y; Li J; Cai H; He Z; Ke Y Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jul; 18(1):228. PubMed ID: 32660494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing and transforming PROMIS utility values to the EQ-5D. Hartman JD; Craig BM Qual Life Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):725-733. PubMed ID: 29264776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of UK and Brazilian SF-6D Preference Weights When Applied to a Brazilian Urban Population. Ferraz MB; Nardi EP; Campolina AG Value Health Reg Issues; 2019 Dec; 20():21-27. PubMed ID: 30634088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health utility scores of family caregivers for leukemia patients measured by EQ-5D-3L: a cross-sectional survey in China. Yu H; Zhang H; Yang J; Liu C; Lu C; Yang H; Huang W; Zhou J; Fu W; Shi L; Yan Y; Liu G; Li L BMC Cancer; 2018 Oct; 18(1):950. PubMed ID: 30285666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer. Pickard AS; Ray S; Ganguli A; Cella D Value Health; 2012; 15(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 22433762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of Iran and UK EQ-5D-3L Value Sets Based on Visual Analogue Scale. Kiadaliri AA Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 May; 6(5):267-272. PubMed ID: 28812814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptability and Validity of the EQ-5D in Patients Living With Dementia. Michalowsky B; Xie F; Kohlmann T; Gräske J; Wübbeler M; Thyrian JR; Hoffmann W Value Health; 2020 Jun; 23(6):760-767. PubMed ID: 32540234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Caregivers' assessments of preference-based quality of life in Alzheimer's disease. Karlawish JH; Zbrozek A; Kinosian B; Gregory A; Ferguson A; Low DV; Glick HA Alzheimers Dement; 2008 May; 4(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 18631969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the choice of tariff matter?: A comparison of EQ-5D-5L utility scores using Chinese, UK, and Japanese tariffs on patients with psoriasis vulgaris in Central South China. Zhao Y; Li SP; Liu L; Zhang JL; Chen G Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Aug; 96(34):e7840. PubMed ID: 28834893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population. Petrou S; Hockley C Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the choice of EQ-5D tariff matter? A comparison of the Swedish EQ-5D-3L index score with UK, US, Germany and Denmark among type 2 diabetes patients. Kiadaliri AA; Eliasson B; Gerdtham UG Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Sep; 13():145. PubMed ID: 26374709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of EuroQol 5-Dimension health-related utilities using Italian, UK, and US preference weights in a patient sample. Mozzi A; Meregaglia M; Lazzaro C; Tornatore V; Belfiglio M; Fattore G Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2016; 8():267-74. PubMed ID: 27358571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]