These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27431514)

  • 1. Development of a multi-criteria evaluation system to assess growing pig welfare.
    Martín P; Traulsen I; Buxadé C; Krieter J
    Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):466-477. PubMed ID: 27431514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a multi-criteria evaluation model for animal welfare.
    Martín P; Czycholl I; Buxadé C; Krieter J
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):650-660. PubMed ID: 27573713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the multi-criteria evaluation system of the Welfare Quality® protocol for growing pigs.
    Czycholl I; Kniese C; Schrader L; Krieter J
    Animal; 2017 Sep; 11(9):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 28219478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-farm animal welfare assessment in beef bulls: consistency over time of single measures and aggregated Welfare Quality(®) scores.
    Kirchner MK; Schulze Westerath H; Knierim U; Tessitore E; Cozzi G; Winckler C
    Animal; 2014 Mar; 8(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 24330803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trained-user opinion about Welfare Quality measures and integrated scoring of dairy cattle welfare.
    de Graaf S; Ampe B; Winckler C; Radeski M; Mounier L; Kirchner MK; Haskell MJ; van Eerdenburg FJCM; des Roches AB; Andreasen SN; Bijttebier J; Lauwers L; Verbeke W; Tuyttens FAM
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Aug; 100(8):6376-6388. PubMed ID: 28571983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating results of the Welfare Quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classification of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level.
    de Vries M; Bokkers EA; van Schaik G; Botreau R; Engel B; Dijkstra T; de Boer IJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6264-73. PubMed ID: 23932136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the Welfare Quality® assessment system on European beef bull farms.
    Kirchner MK; Schulze Westerath H; Knierim U; Tessitore E; Cozzi G; Pfeiffer C; Winckler C
    Animal; 2014 May; 8(5):827-35. PubMed ID: 24739354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation of animal-based parameters with environment-based parameters in an on-farm welfare assessment of growing pigs.
    Kang HJ; Bae S; Lee H
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2022 May; 64(3):539-563. PubMed ID: 35709106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can the monitoring of animal welfare parameters predict pork meat quality variation through the supply chain (from farm to slaughter)?
    Rocha LM; Velarde A; Dalmau A; Saucier L; Faucitano L
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jan; 94(1):359-76. PubMed ID: 26812341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare.
    de Jong IC; Hindle VA; Butterworth A; Engel B; Ferrari P; Gunnink H; Perez Moya T; Tuyttens FA; van Reenen CG
    Animal; 2016 Jan; 10(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 26306882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ANIMAL BEHAVIOR AND WELL-BEING SYMPOSIUM: The Common Swine Industry Audit: Future steps to assure positive on-farm animal welfare utilizing validated, repeatable and feasible animal-based measures.
    Pairis-Garcia M; Moeller SJ
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Mar; 95(3):1372-1381. PubMed ID: 28380534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicriteria Evaluation of Classical Swine Fever Control Strategies Using the Choquet Integral.
    Brosig J; Traulsen I; Krieter J
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2016 Feb; 63(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 24661927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of the qualitative behavior assessment as included in the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for growing pigs.
    Czycholl I; Beilage EG; Henning C; Krieter J
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3445-3454. PubMed ID: 28805930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: model structure and weighting procedure.
    Bracke MB; Spruijt BM; Metz JH; Schouten WG
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jul; 80(7):1819-34. PubMed ID: 12162649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.
    van Staaveren N; Doyle B; Manzanilla EG; Calderón Díaz JA; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 28464078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing.
    Temple D; Courboulay V; Manteca X; Velarde A; Dalmau A
    Animal; 2012 Apr; 6(4):656-67. PubMed ID: 22436283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does group size have an impact on welfare indicators in fattening pigs?
    Meyer-Hamme SE; Lambertz C; Gauly M
    Animal; 2016 Jan; 10(1):142-9. PubMed ID: 26304017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of pig welfare assessment protocol integrating animal-, environment-, and management-based measures.
    Renggaman A; Choi HL; Sudiarto SIa; Alasaarela L; Nam OS
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2015; 57():1. PubMed ID: 26290721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Creating a model to detect dairy cattle farms with poor welfare using a national database.
    Krug C; Haskell MJ; Nunes T; Stilwell G
    Prev Vet Med; 2015 Dec; 122(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26549665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of Fear Assessment in Growing Pigs Exposed to a Novel Object Test in Commercial Conditions.
    Dalmau A; Mainau E; Velarde A
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017; 20(3):280-288. PubMed ID: 28409651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.