812 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27431607)
1. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis.
Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Vliegenthart R; Duguay TM; Stubenrauch AC; Rosenberg RD; Varga-Szemes A; Bayer RR; Yang J; Ebersberger U; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Chiaramida SA; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 27431607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events.
Tesche C; Plank F; De Cecco CN; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Varga-Szemes A; Bayer RR; Yang J; Jacks IL; Gramer BM; Ebersberger U; Hoffmann E; Chiaramida SA; Feuchtner G; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(6):458-465. PubMed ID: 27522574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Caruso D; Baumann S; Renker M; Mangold S; Dyer KT; Varga-Szemes A; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26993434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary in-stent restenosis: predisposing clinical and stent-related factors, diagnostic performance and analyses of inaccuracies in 320-row computed tomography angiography.
Wan YL; Tsay PK; Chen CC; Juan YH; Huang YC; Chan WH; Wen MS; Hsieh IC
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():105-15. PubMed ID: 27106698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors for functionally significant in-stent restenosis: an integrated analysis using coronary angiography, IVUS, and myocardial perfusion imaging.
Kang SJ; Cho YR; Park GM; Ahn JM; Han SB; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1183-90. PubMed ID: 24229771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regional calcified plaque score evaluated by multidetector computed tomography for predicting the addition of rotational atherectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention.
Sekimoto T; Akutsu Y; Hamazaki Y; Sakai K; Kosaki R; Yokota H; Tsujita H; Tsukamoto S; Kaneko K; Sakurai M; Kodama Y; Li HL; Sambe T; Oguchi K; Uchida N; Kobayashi S; Aoki A; Gokan T; Kobayashi Y
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 26811266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calcification remodeling index assessed by cardiac CT predicts severe coronary stenosis in lesions with moderate to severe calcification.
Yu M; Li Y; Li W; Lu Z; Wei M; Zhang J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28988831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of in-stent neoatherosclerosis and tissue characteristics between early and late in-stent restenosis in second-generation drug-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography study.
Sabbah M; Kadota K; El-Eraky A; Kamal HM; Abdellah AT; El Hawary A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1463-1472. PubMed ID: 28444549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incremental prognostic value of quantitative plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography during 5 years of follow up.
Nadjiri J; Hausleiter J; Jähnichen C; Will A; Hendrich E; Martinoff S; Hadamitzky M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 26837235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of optimal stent area to prevent in-stent restenosis after zotarolimus-, everolimus-, and sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.
Song HG; Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Kim WJ; Lee JY; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 22815193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional evaluation of the spatial morphology of stented coronary artery segments in relation to restenosis.
Üveges Á; Jenei C; Kiss T; Szegedi Z; Tar B; Szabó GT; Czuriga D; Kőszegi Z
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1755-1763. PubMed ID: 31127455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The frequency and clinical characteristics of in-stent restenosis due to calcified nodule development after coronary stent implantation.
Isodono K; Fujii K; Fujimoto T; Kasahara T; Ariyoshi M; Irie D; Tsubakimoto Y; Sakatani T; Matsuo A; Inoue K; Fujita H
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jan; 37(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 32734495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of insulin resistance on in-stent restenosis in patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation after long-term angiographic follow-up.
Zhao LP; Xu WT; Wang L; Li H; Shao CL; Gu HB; Chan SP; Xu HF; Yang XJ
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Jan; 26(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 25211654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of optical coherence tomography- and coronary angioscopy-assessed neointimal tissue characteristics on occurrence of periprocedural myonecrosis in patients with in-stent restenosis.
Kimura S; Sugiyama T; Hishikari K; Nakamura S; Nakagama S; Misawa T; Mizusawa M; Hayasaka K; Yamakami Y; Sagawa Y; Kojima K; Ohtani H; Hikita H; Takahashi A; Isobe M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1483-94. PubMed ID: 27423209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and pathological characteristics of homogeneous and nonhomogeneous tissue of in-stent restenosis visualized by optical coherence tomography.
Itoh T; Fusazaki T; Kimura T; Oikawa H; Sasou S; Ishikawa Y; Goto I; Komuro K; Nakajima S; Koeda Y; Kaneko K; Nishiyama O; Nakamura M; Morino Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2015 May; 26(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 25714072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.
Tiroch K; Mehilli J; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Massberg S; Laugwitz KL; Vorpahl M; Seyfarth M; Kastrati A;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 24332416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: value of subtraction coronary computed tomography angiography.
Amanuma M; Kondo T; Sano T; Takayanagi T; Matsutani H; Sekine T; Arai T; Morita H; Ishizaka K; Arakita K; Iwasa A; Takase S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 26662268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors for revascularization and in-stent restenosis in patients with triple-vessel disease after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation: a retrospective analysis.
Zeng M; Yan X; Wu W
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Sep; 21(1):446. PubMed ID: 34535088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serial coronary computed tomography angiography-verified coronary plaque progression: comparison of stented patients with or without diabetes.
Shi R; Shi K; Yang ZG; Guo YK; Diao KY; Gao Y; Zhang Y; Huang S
Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2019 Sep; 18(1):123. PubMed ID: 31551077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative atherosclerotic plaque volume by CT coronary angiography trumps conventional stenosis assessment for identifying flow-limiting lesions.
Kato N; Kishi S; Arbab-Zadeh A; Rybicki FJ; Tanimoto S; Aoki J; Watanabe M; Horiuchi Y; Furui K; Hara K; Ibukuro K; Lima JAC; Tanabe K
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 33(11):1847-1855. PubMed ID: 28597124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
