These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27432594)

  • 21. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Oshika T; Tokunaga T; Samejima T; Miyata K; Kawana K; Kaji Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(4):1334-8. PubMed ID: 16565365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.
    Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
    Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2064-74. PubMed ID: 17137985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation.
    Cheng H; Barnett JK; Vilupuru AS; Marsack JD; Kasthurirangan S; Applegate RA; Roorda A
    J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):272-80. PubMed ID: 15134474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility of wavefront measurements using the LADARWave aberrometer.
    Lewis CD; Krueger RR
    J Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 22(9):S973-9. PubMed ID: 17124900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of monochromatic ocular aberrations measured with an objective cross-cylinder aberroscope and a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer.
    Hong X; Thibos LN; Bradley A; Woods RL; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 12553540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of an automated refractor using a Hartmann-Shack sensor after corneal refractive surgery and cataract surgery.
    Park JH; Kim MJ; Park JH; Song IS; Kim JY; Tchah H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1889-97. PubMed ID: 26603398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wavefront aberrometry repeatability and agreement-A comparison between Pentacam AXL Wave, iTrace and OPD-Scan III.
    Wan KH; Liao XL; Yu M; Tsui RWY; Chow VWS; Chong KKL; Chan TCY
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1326-1337. PubMed ID: 36102169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring ocular aberrations and image quality in peripheral vision with a clinical wavefront aberrometer.
    Shen J; Thibos LN
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 May; 92(3):212-22. PubMed ID: 19462503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a new simultaneous capture aberrometer/corneal topographer.
    Gifford P; Swarbrick HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):929-38. PubMed ID: 22543999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age-related changes in ocular aberrations with accommodation.
    Radhakrishnan H; Charman WN
    J Vis; 2007 May; 7(7):11.1-21. PubMed ID: 17685807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology.
    Rocha KM; Vabre L; Harms F; Chateau N; Krueger RR
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Nov; 23(9):953-9. PubMed ID: 18041253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A method to predict refractive errors from wave aberration data.
    Guirao A; Williams DR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jan; 80(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12553542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the Agreement Between a New Pyramid Wavefront Sensor Aberrometer and Scheiner-Smirnov Aberrometers.
    Yang Y; Ning R; Xu S; Xiahou J; Li J; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J
    J Refract Surg; 2024 Apr; 40(4):e218-e228. PubMed ID: 38593257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical study of higher order wavefront aberrations with a Tscherning aberrometer].
    Chen YG; Zhong YY; Xia YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2005 Oct; 37(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 16224527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the SVOne: A Handheld, Smartphone-Based Autorefractor.
    Ciuffreda KJ; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1133-9. PubMed ID: 26540478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative comparison of different-shaped wavefront sensors and preliminary results for defocus aberrations on a mechanical eye.
    Carvalho LA; Chamon W; Schor P; Castro JC
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 16699677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer.
    Cheng X; Himebaugh NL; Kollbaum PS; Thibos LN; Bradley A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Aug; 80(8):587-95. PubMed ID: 12917578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.