These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27433191)
1. The Resolution Integral - a tool for characterising the performance of diagnostic ultrasound scanners. Moran CM; Inglis S; Pye SD Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 27433191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Imaging Performance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Scanners Using the Edinburgh Pipe Phantom to Measure the Resolution Integral - 15 Years of Experience. Moran CM; Inglis S; McBride K; Mcleod C; Pye SD Ultraschall Med; 2022 Aug; 43(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 32590848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the imaging performance of high resolution ultrasound scanners for preclinical imaging. Moran CM; Pye SD; Ellis W; Janeczko A; Morris KD; McNeilly AS; Fraser HM Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):493-501. PubMed ID: 21256667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Intravascular Ultrasound Catheter-Based Transducers Using the Resolution Integral. McLeod C; Moran CM; McBride KA; Pye SD Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2802-2812. PubMed ID: 30146091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting failed elements on phased array ultrasound transducers using the Edinburgh Pipe Phantom. Welsh D; Inglis S; Pye SD Ultrasound; 2016 May; 24(2):68-93. PubMed ID: 27482276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Assessment of the Imaging Performance of Hand-Held Ultrasound Scanners Using the Edinburgh Pipe Phantom. Moran CM; McLeod C; Inglis S; Pye SD Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Aug; 50(8):1178-1182. PubMed ID: 38705784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated performance assessment of ultrasound systems using a dynamic phantom. Joy J; Riedel F; Valente AA; Cochran S; Corner GA Ultrasound; 2014 Nov; 22(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 27433220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The resolution integral: visual and computational approaches to characterizing ultrasound images. MacGillivray TJ; Ellis W; Pye SD Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5067-88. PubMed ID: 20702928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the imaging capabilities of radial mechanical and electronic echo-endoscopes using the resolution integral. Inglis S; Janeczko A; Ellis W; Plevris JN; Pye SD Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1896-907. PubMed ID: 24798390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phantom-based quality assurance measurements in B-mode ultrasound. Mannila V; Sipilä O Acta Radiol Short Rep; 2013; 2(8):2047981613511967. PubMed ID: 24349715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners. Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluations of UltraiQ software for objective ultrasound image quality assessment using images from a commercial scanner. Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Gorny KR; Hangiandreou NJ J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 29336119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognising small image quality differences for ultrasound probes and the potential of misdiagnosis due to undetected side lobes. Doblhoff G; Satrapa J; Coulthard P Ultrasound; 2017 Feb; 25(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 28228823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The automated assessment of ultrasound scanner lateral and slice thickness resolution: use of the step response. Rowland DE; Newey VR; Turner DP; Nassiri DK Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1525-34. PubMed ID: 19560252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pipe Phantoms With Applications in Molecular Imaging and System Characterization. Wang S; Herbst EB; Pye SD; Moran CM; Hossack JA IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 27845659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The analysis of in-air reverberation patterns from medical ultrasound transducers. Quinn T; Verma PK Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 27433190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A case study in scanner optimisation. Dudley NJ; Gibson NM Ultrasound; 2014 Feb; 22(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 27433189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing cutoff values for a quality assurance test using an ultrasound phantom in screening ultrasound examinations for hepatocellular carcinoma: an initial report of a nationwide survey in Korea. Choi JI; Kim PN; Jeong WK; Kim HC; Yang DM; Cha SH; Chung JJ J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Sep; 30(9):1221-9. PubMed ID: 21876093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of the effect of subcutaneous fat on image quality performance of 2D conventional imaging and tissue harmonic imaging. Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 31(7):957-64. PubMed ID: 15972201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]