555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27434281)
1. Stem geometry changes initial femoral fixation stability of a revised press-fit hip prosthesis: A finite element study.
Russell RD; Huo MH; Rodrigues DC; Kosmopoulos V
Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov; 24(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 27434281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tapered vs Cylindrical Stem Fixation in a Model of Femoral Bone Deficiency in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Russell RD; Pierce W; Huo MH
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1352-1355. PubMed ID: 26795255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modified metaphyseal-loading anterolaterally flared anatomic femoral stem: five- to nine-year prospective follow-up evaluation and results of three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kokubo Y; Uchida K; Oki H; Negoro K; Nagamune K; Kawaguchi S; Takeno K; Yayama T; Nakajima H; Sugita D; Yoshida A; Baba H
Artif Organs; 2013 Feb; 37(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 23009086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the fixation region of a press-fit hip endoprosthesis on the stress-strain state of the "bone-implant" system.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Goethel MF; Loskutov A
Comput Biol Med; 2017 May; 84():195-204. PubMed ID: 28390287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation of non-cemented total hip arthroplasty femoral components in a simulated proximal bone defect model.
Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Knutsen AR; Borkowski SL; Kalma JJ; Bengs BC
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1618-24. PubMed ID: 23523487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cylindrical and tapered stem designs for femoral revision hip arthroplasty.
Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Sun JN; Hua ZJ; Chen XY; Feng S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):411. PubMed ID: 32600293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Proximal and Distal Femoral Canal Geometry Influences Cementless Stem Anchorage and Revision Hip and Knee Implant Stability.
Heinecke M; Rathje F; Layher F; Matziolis G
Orthopedics; 2018 May; 41(3):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 29570762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of modular tapered versus modular cylindrical stems for complex femoral revisions.
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Study Group
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):71-3. PubMed ID: 24034509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of contact ratio and its location on the primary stability of cementless total hip arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
Reimeringer M; Nuño N
J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1064-1070. PubMed ID: 26920509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of distal stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented revision total hip prostheses.
Kirk KL; Potter BK; Lehman RA; Xenos JS
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Oct; 36(10):545-9. PubMed ID: 18033566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of proximal femoral bone support on the fixation of a press-fit noncemented total hip replacement femoral component.
Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Borkowski SL; Oakes DA; Reid JJ; Bengs BC
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2013 Jun; 11(1):e26-34. PubMed ID: 23413131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: finite element model.
Shultz TR; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Norman TL
J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 16532611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite Element Analysis of porously punched prosthetic short stem virtually designed for simulative uncemented Hip Arthroplasty.
Peng MJ; Chen HY; Hu Y; Ju X; Bai B
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jul; 18(1):295. PubMed ID: 28693543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cementless revision femoral stems application of press-fit principles and clinical outcomes.
Canovas F; Putman S; Dagneaux L; Chadli L; Le Béguec P
Int Orthop; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2261-2267. PubMed ID: 30554260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?
Huddleston JI; Tetreault MW; Yu M; Bedair H; Hansen VJ; Choi HR; Goodman SB; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 26245164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Numerical simulation of the insertion process of an uncemented hip prosthesis in order to evaluate the influence of residual stress and contact distribution on the stem initial stability.
Monea AG; Pastrav LC; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Jaecques SV
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(3):263-76. PubMed ID: 22548243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
