BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27434362)

  • 21. In vivo volumetric analysis of coronary stent using optical coherence tomography with a novel balloon occlusion-flushing catheter: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Kawase Y; Hoshino K; Yoneyama R; McGregor J; Hajjar RJ; Jang IK; Hayase M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1343-9. PubMed ID: 16223637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multimodality imaging of attenuated plaque using grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography.
    Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 25511369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
    Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography catheter for imaging of coronary atherosclerosis.
    Li BH; Leung AS; Soong A; Munding CE; Lee H; Thind AS; Munce NR; Wright GA; Rowsell CH; Yang VX; Strauss BH; Foster FS; Courtney BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):494-507. PubMed ID: 22566368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of nonuniform rotational distortion between mechanical IVUS and OCT using a phantom model.
    Kawase Y; Suzuki Y; Ikeno F; Yoneyama R; Hoshino K; Ly HQ; Lau GT; Hayase M; Yeung AC; Hajjar RJ; Jang IK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 33(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 17189048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for stenosis quantification using quantitative coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound as the gold standard.
    Joshi SB; Okabe T; Roswell RO; Weissman G; Lopez CF; Lindsay J; Pichard AD; Weissman NJ; Waksman R; Weigold WG
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19801022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The ability of optical coherence tomography to monitor percutaneous coronary intervention: detailed comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Kawamori H; Shite J; Shinke T; Otake H; Sawada T; Kato H; Miyoshi N; Yoshino N; Kozuki A; Hariki H; Inoue T; Hirata K
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 22(11):541-5. PubMed ID: 21041851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic Performance of High-Resolution Intravascular Ultrasound for Abnormal Post-Stent Findings After Stent Implantation - A Comparison Study Between High-Resolution Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Ando H; Nakano Y; Sawada H; Ohashi H; Takashima H; Suzuki A; Sakurai S; Amano T
    Circ J; 2021 May; 85(6):883-890. PubMed ID: 33551396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feasibility of intracoronary frequency domain optical coherence tomography derived fractional flow reserve for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
    Zafar H; Sharif F; Leahy MJ
    Int Heart J; 2014; 55(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 24909988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound or angiography guidance for distal left main coronary stenting. The ROCK cohort II study.
    Cortese B; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Lanocha M; Ielasi A; Giannini F; Campo G; D'Ascenzo F; Latini RA; Krestianinov O; Alfonso F; Trani C; Prati F; Linares JA; Sardella G; Wlodarczak A; Viganò E; Camarero TG; Stella P; Sozykin A; Fineschi M; Burzotta F
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):664-673. PubMed ID: 34582631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound images for tissue characterization of human coronary plaques.
    Kawasaki M; Bouma BE; Bressner J; Houser SL; Nadkarni SK; MacNeill BD; Jang IK; Fujiwara H; Tearney GJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 48(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 16814652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is quantitative coronary angiography reliable in assessing the lumen gain after treatment with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable polylactide scaffold?
    Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Suwannasom P; Tateishi H; Tenekecioglu E; Zeng Y; Cavalcante R; Jonker H; Dijkstra J; Foin N; Koon JN; Collet C; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Stone GW; Popma JJ; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(8):e998-e1008. PubMed ID: 27721215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of tissue prolapse with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound after drug-eluting stent implantation.
    Sohn J; Hur SH; Kim IC; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Nam CW; Kim YN; Kim KB
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 31(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25273918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate stent implantation in patients with calcific coronary artery disease.
    Gudmundsdottir I; Adamson P; Gray C; Spratt JC; Behan MW; Henriksen P; Newby DE; Mills N; Uren NG; Cruden NL
    Open Heart; 2015; 2(1):e000225. PubMed ID: 26719807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combined NIRS and IVUS imaging detects vulnerable plaque using a single catheter system: a head-to-head comparison with OCT.
    Roleder T; Kovacic JC; Ali Z; Sharma R; Cristea E; Moreno P; Sharma SK; Narula J; Kini AS
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Jul; 10(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24769522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Combined use of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound imaging in patients undergoing coronary interventions for stent thrombosis.
    Alfonso F; Dutary J; Paulo M; Gonzalo N; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Escaned J; Bañuelos C; Hernández R; Macaya C
    Heart; 2012 Aug; 98(16):1213-20. PubMed ID: 22826559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Overestimation of acute lumen gain and late lumen loss by quantitative coronary angiography (compared with intravascular ultrasound) in stented lesions.
    Hoffmann R; Mintz GS; Popma JJ; Satler LF; Kent KM; Pichard AD; Leon MB
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10):1277-81. PubMed ID: 9388098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.