588 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27435230)
21. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis.
Oechtering TH; Hons CF; Sieren M; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Drexl J; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 152(2):418-427.e1. PubMed ID: 27423836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Motion-aware stroke volume quantification in 4D PC-MRI data of the human aorta.
Köhler B; Preim U; Grothoff M; Gutberlet M; Fischbach K; Preim B
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Feb; 11(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 26183147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of 4D flow CMR against simultaneous invasive hemodynamic measurements: a swine study.
Stam K; Chelu RG; van der Velde N; van Duin R; Wielopolski P; Nieman K; Merkus D; Hirsch A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 30963352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pressure drop mapping using 4D flow MRI in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease: A novel marker of valvular obstruction.
Fatehi Hassanabad A; Burns F; Bristow MS; Lydell C; Howarth AG; Heydari B; Gao X; Fedak PWM; White JA; Garcia J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 65():175-182. PubMed ID: 31726212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 4D flow MRI, cardiac function, and T
Geiger J; Rahsepar AA; Suwa K; Powell A; Ghasemiesfe A; Barker AJ; Collins JD; Carr JC; Markl M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jul; 48(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 29206322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.
Rengier F; Delles M; Eichhorn J; Azad YJ; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 31(4):823-30. PubMed ID: 25645544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Aortic hemodynamics in patients with and without repair of aortic coarctation: in vivo analysis by 4D flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.
Frydrychowicz A; Markl M; Hirtler D; Harloff A; Schlensak C; Geiger J; Stiller B; Arnold R
Invest Radiol; 2011 May; 46(5):317-25. PubMed ID: 21285892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multipoint 5D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - accelerated cardiac- and respiratory-motion resolved mapping of mean and turbulent velocities.
Walheim J; Dillinger H; Kozerke S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Jul; 21(1):42. PubMed ID: 31331353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in whole-heart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 Tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study.
Garg P; Westenberg JJM; van den Boogaard PJ; Swoboda PP; Aziz R; Foley JRJ; Fent GJ; Tyl FGJ; Coratella L; ElBaz MSM; van der Geest RJ; Higgins DM; Greenwood JP; Plein S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):272-281. PubMed ID: 28470915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI.
Rose MJ; Jarvis K; Chowdhary V; Barker AJ; Allen BD; Robinson JD; Markl M; Rigsby CK; Schnell S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1673-1682. PubMed ID: 27192153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantification of peak blood flow velocity at the cardiac valve and great thoracic vessels by four-dimensional flow and two-dimensional phase-contrast MRI compared with echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xu K; Wang XD; Yang ZG; Xu HY; Xu R; Xie LJ; Wen LY; Fu H; Yan WF; Guo YK
Clin Radiol; 2021 Nov; 76(11):863.e1-863.e10. PubMed ID: 34404516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Atlas-based analysis of 4D flow CMR: automated vessel segmentation and flow quantification.
Bustamante M; Petersson S; Eriksson J; Alehagen U; Dyverfeldt P; Carlhäll CJ; Ebbers T
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Oct; 17():87. PubMed ID: 26438074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. k-t accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI in under two minutes: Feasibility and impact of resolution, k-space sampling patterns, and respiratory navigator gating on hemodynamic measurements.
Bollache E; Barker AJ; Dolan RS; Carr JC; van Ooij P; Ahmadian R; Powell A; Collins JD; Geiger J; Markl M
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):195-207. PubMed ID: 28266062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 4D flow MR imaging of the portal venous system: a feasibility study in children.
Parekh K; Markl M; Rose M; Schnell S; Popescu A; Rigsby CK
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):832-840. PubMed ID: 27193778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of principal component analysis acceleration factor on velocity measurement in 2D and 4D PC-MRI.
Pagé G; Bettoni J; Salsac AV; Balédent O
MAGMA; 2018 Jun; 31(3):469-481. PubMed ID: 29357015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 3.0T, time-resolved, 3D flow-sensitive MR in the thoracic aorta: Impact of k-t BLAST acceleration using 8- versus 32-channel coil arrays.
Zaman A; Motwani M; Oliver JJ; Crelier G; Dobson LE; Higgins DM; Plein S; Greenwood JP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 25447784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluating a Phase-Specific Approach to Aortic Flow: A 4D Flow MRI Study.
Ramaekers MJFG; Westenberg JJM; Venner MFGHM; Juffermans JF; van Assen HC; Te Kiefte BJC; Adriaans BP; Lamb HJ; Wildberger JE; Schalla S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Mar; 59(3):1056-1067. PubMed ID: 37309838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accelerated aortic 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance using compressed sensing: applicability, validation and clinical integration.
Neuhaus E; Weiss K; Bastkowski R; Koopmann J; Maintz D; Giese D
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Oct; 21(1):65. PubMed ID: 31638997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography.
Gabbour M; Schnell S; Jarvis K; Robinson JD; Markl M; Rigsby CK
Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 25487721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
