These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27435273)

  • 21. [Application of new speech intelligibility tests in silence for the assessment of acquired hearing losses].
    Sukowski H; Wagener KC; Thiele C; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2013 Jan; 61(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 23223925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B; Peeters H; Keenan D
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):779-95. PubMed ID: 20622673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The age effect in evaluation of hearing aid benefits by speech audiometry].
    Müller A; Hocke T; Hoppe U; Mir-Salim P
    HNO; 2016 Mar; 64(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 26801889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].
    Löhler J; Sippel M; Walther LE; Schönweiler R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2022 Apr; 101(4):304-309. PubMed ID: 34157776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry.
    Ashoor AA; Prochazka T
    Audiology; 1982; 21(6):493-508. PubMed ID: 7181742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pediatric speech intelligibility test: performance-intensity characteristics.
    Jerger S; Jerger J
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 7152156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Implementation of the speech comprehension test for complex syntactic structures (after D.V. Bishop) in 6- and 8-year-old primary school children].
    Feldhusen F; Brunner M; Heinrich C; Pröschel U
    HNO; 2007 Sep; 55(9):729-36. PubMed ID: 17415540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variability of word discrimination scores in clinical practice and consequences on their sensitivity to hearing loss.
    Moulin A; Bernard A; Tordella L; Vergne J; Gisbert A; Martin C; Richard C
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2117-2124. PubMed ID: 28039514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of the Göttingen sentence test and the monosyllabic rhyme test by von Wallenberg and Kollmeier with the Freiburg speech test : Investigation in a clinically representative group of listeners].
    Sukowski H; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    HNO; 2010 Jun; 58(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 20533016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Experiences with the distorted Freiburg Speech Test--diagnosis and rehabilitation of hearing disorders].
    Dieroff HG; Mangoldt W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):372-8. PubMed ID: 2765049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Hearing loss determination and assessment of the reduction in earning capacity taking speech discrimination tests in noise into account].
    Thiele C; Sukowski H; Wagener K; Kollmeier B; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    HNO; 2011 Nov; 59(11):1111-7. PubMed ID: 21959774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
    Kiliç MA; Ogüt F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.