68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2743534)
1. Implications of survival curve slopes on the interpretation of adjuvant therapy results.
Eriguchi M; Mathé G
Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 1989; 126(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 2743534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New survival curve model for comparison of adjuvant therapy of malignant diseases.
Eriguchi M; Mathé G
Biomed Pharmacother; 1986; 40(4):143-7. PubMed ID: 3790708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of survival curve slopes on the interpretation of adjuvant therapy results.
Eriguchi M; Mathé G
Suppl J Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother; 1988; 1():93-7. PubMed ID: 3074230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized trial of adjuvant therapy in colon carcinoma: 10-year results of NSABP protocol C-01.
Smith RE; Colangelo L; Wieand HS; Begovic M; Wolmark N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug; 96(15):1128-32. PubMed ID: 15292384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evolution of adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer from Bonadonna to the taxanes].
Nagykálnai T
Magy Onkol; 2002; 46(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 12563352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phase III trial evaluating the addition of paclitaxel to doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, as adjuvant or primary systemic therapy: European Cooperative Trial in Operable Breast Cancer.
Gianni L; Baselga J; Eiermann W; Porta VG; Semiglazov V; Lluch A; Zambetti M; Sabadell D; Raab G; Cussac AL; Bozhok A; Martinez-Agulló A; Greco M; Byakhov M; Lopez JJ; Mansutti M; Valagussa P; Bonadonna G
J Clin Oncol; 2009 May; 27(15):2474-81. PubMed ID: 19332727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: results from the international adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy randomized trial.
Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trials Collaborative Group
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Apr; 99(7):506-15. PubMed ID: 17405995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premonopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: indirect comparison of dose and schedule in DBCG trials 77, 82, and 89.
Ejlertsen B; Mouridsen HT; Jensen MB
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):662-71. PubMed ID: 18465334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the outcomes of non-randomised chemotherapy regimens in node positive breast cancer.
Kuru B; Camlibel M; Dinc S; Gulcelik MA; Atalay C; Alagol H
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Sep; 24(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 16270522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HER-2 amplification and topoisomerase IIalpha gene aberrations as predictive markers in node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated either with an anthracycline-based therapy or with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil.
Di Leo A; Gancberg D; Larsimont D; Tanner M; Jarvinen T; Rouas G; Dolci S; Leroy JY; Paesmans M; Isola J; Piccart MJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2002 May; 8(5):1107-16. PubMed ID: 12006526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locoregional radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 20-year results of the British Columbia randomized trial.
Ragaz J; Olivotto IA; Spinelli JJ; Phillips N; Jackson SM; Wilson KS; Knowling MA; Coppin CM; Weir L; Gelmon K; Le N; Durand R; Coldman AJ; Manji M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jan; 97(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 15657341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adriamycin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil (AVCF) compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in premenopausal breast carcinoma. Personal results.
Mathé G; Misset JL; Plagne R; Reizenstein P; Belpomme D; Le Mevel B; Guerrin J; Fumoleau P; Metz R; Delgado M
Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1986; 12(1-3):143-5. PubMed ID: 3525068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anemia is a significant prognostic factor in local relapse-free survival of premenopausal primary breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy.
Dubsky P; Sevelda P; Jakesz R; Hausmaninger H; Samonigg H; Seifert M; Denison U; Mlineritsch B; Steger G; Kwasny W; Stöger H; Bartsch R; Stierer M; Taucher S; Fridrik M; Schippinger W; Greil R; Pötter R; Gnant M;
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Apr; 14(7):2082-7. PubMed ID: 18381948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjuvant systemic treatment of resectable breast cancer: eleven years results of a monoinstitutional chemo-hormone-immunotherapy trial.
Rosso R; Boccardo F; Brema F; Sertoli MR; Amoroso D; Bertelli G; Pronzato P
Anticancer Res; 1989; 9(4):1153-6. PubMed ID: 2817796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DBCG trial 89B comparing adjuvant CMF and ovarian ablation: similar outcome for eligible but non-enrolled and randomized breast cancer patients.
Ejlertsen B; Jensen MB; Mouridsen HT; Andersen J; Cold S; Jakobsen E; Kamby C; Sørensen PG; Ewertz M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):709-17. PubMed ID: 18465339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of clinical protocols through the mathematical results analysis of survival curves.
Eriguchi M; Mathé G
Drugs Exp Clin Res; 1986; 12(1-3):51-6. PubMed ID: 3732055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) versus hormonal ablation with leuprorelin acetate as adjuvant treatment of node-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients: preliminary results of the TABLE-study (Takeda Adjuvant Breast cancer study with Leuprorelin Acetate).
Schmid P; Untch M; Wallwiener D; Kossé V; Bondar G; Vassiljev L; Tarutinov V; Kienle E; Lüftner D; Possinger K;
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2325-32. PubMed ID: 12174922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thirty-year follow-up of chemo/hormonal therapy in node-positive breast cancer.
Gordon NH; Silverman P; Lasheen W; Meinert J; Siminoff LA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 102(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 17033926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral uracil and tegafur compared with classic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil as postoperative chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, high-risk breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer 01 Trial.
Watanabe T; Sano M; Takashima S; Kitaya T; Tokuda Y; Yoshimoto M; Kohno N; Nakagami K; Iwata H; Shimozuma K; Sonoo H; Tsuda H; Sakamoto G; Ohashi Y
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(9):1368-74. PubMed ID: 19204202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chemoendocrine compared with endocrine adjuvant therapies for node-negative breast cancer: predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors--International Breast Cancer Study Group.
Viale G; Regan MM; Maiorano E; Mastropasqua MG; Golouh R; Perin T; Brown RW; Kovács A; Pillay K; Ohlschlegel C; Braye S; Grigolato P; Rusca T; Gelber RD; Castiglione-Gertsch M; Price KN; Goldhirsch A; Gusterson BA; Coates AS
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(9):1404-10. PubMed ID: 18349391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
