1548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27435701)
1. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.
Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques.
Wang JG; Huang J; Chin AI
Asian J Androl; 2014; 16(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 24969055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience.
Afferi L; Moschini M; Baumeister P; Zamboni S; Cornelius J; Ineichen G; Mattei A; Mordasini L
World J Urol; 2021 Feb; 39(2):389-397. PubMed ID: 32328779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Bütow Z; Schunk S; Janssen M; Gräber S; Saar M; Kamradt J; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH
Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 26575991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.
Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ
Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months.
Abdel Raheem A; Chang KD; Alenzi MJ; Ham WS; Han WK; Choi YD; Rha KH
Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 30276864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study.
Mirmilstein G; Rai BP; Gbolahan O; Srirangam V; Narula A; Agarwal S; Lane TM; Vasdev N; Adshead J
BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):854-862. PubMed ID: 29124889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Sivaraman A; Kameh D; Palmer KJ; Patel VR
Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):796-802. PubMed ID: 22230713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.
Lee D; Choi SK; Park J; Shim M; Kim A; Lee S; Song C; Ahn H
Korean J Urol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):572-9. PubMed ID: 26279826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-Year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
Lee YS; Shin TY
Urol J; 2020 Jul; 18(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 32715457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
