BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27436016)

  • 1. Liver and biliary damages following transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between drug-eluting beads and lipiodol emulsion.
    Monier A; Guiu B; Duran R; Aho S; Bize P; Deltenre P; Dunet V; Denys A
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 27436016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Liver/biliary injuries following chemoembolisation of endocrine tumours and hepatocellular carcinoma: lipiodol vs. drug-eluting beads.
    Guiu B; Deschamps F; Aho S; Munck F; Dromain C; Boige V; Malka D; Leboulleux S; Ducreux M; Schlumberger M; Baudin E; de Baere T
    J Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 56(3):609-17. PubMed ID: 22027582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging Changes and Clinical Complications After Drug-Eluting Bead Versus Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Study.
    Zhang L; Sun JH; Ji JS; Zhong BY; Zhou GH; Song JJ; Hou ZH; Huang P; Zhang S; Li Z; Zhu XL; Ni CF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):933-943. PubMed ID: 33245680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of lipiodol infusion and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma in a real-life setting.
    Karalli A; Teiler J; Haji M; Seth E; Brismar TB; Wahlin S; Axelsson R; Stål P
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 54(7):905-912. PubMed ID: 31287338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy and safety.
    Zhang ZS; Li HZ; Ma C; Xiao YD
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1162. PubMed ID: 31783814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study.
    Wu B; Zhou J; Ling G; Zhu D; Long Q
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 16(1):69. PubMed ID: 29587773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five-year outcome of conventional and drug-eluting transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Liu YS; Lin CY; Chuang MT; Lin CY; Tsai YS; Wang CK; Ou MC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 30075752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Kloeckner R; Weinmann A; Prinz F; Pinto dos Santos D; Ruckes C; Dueber C; Pitton MB
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15():465. PubMed ID: 26059447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional Versus Small Doxorubicin-eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Treating Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0/A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kang YJ; Lee BC; Kim JK; Yim NY; Kim HO; Cho SB; Jeong YY
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2020 Jan; 43(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 31646378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transarterial Chemoembolization of Child-A hepatocellular carcinoma: drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB TACE) vs. TACE with cisplatin/lipiodol (cTACE).
    Wiggermann P; Sieron D; Brosche C; Brauer T; Scheer F; Platzek I; Wawrzynek W; Stroszczynski C
    Med Sci Monit; 2011 Apr; 17(4):CR189-95. PubMed ID: 21455104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical investigation on transarterial chemoembolization with indigenous drug-eluting beads in treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma].
    Chen G; Zhang D; Ying Y; Wang Z; Tao W; Zhu H; Zhang J; Peng Z
    Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Jan; 46(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 28436630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drug-eluting beads TACE is safe and non-inferior to conventional TACE in HCC patients with TIPS.
    Fan W; Guo J; Zhu B; Wang S; Yu L; Huang W; Fan H; Li F; Wu Y; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Xue M; Wang H; Li J
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8291-8301. PubMed ID: 33893536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: conventional versus drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
    Gorodetski B; Chapiro J; Schernthaner R; Duran R; Lin M; Lee H; Lenis D; Stuart EA; Nonyane BA; Pekurovsky V; Tamrazi A; Gebauer B; Schlachter T; Pawlik TM; Geschwind JF
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):526-535. PubMed ID: 27277261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hepatic arterial damage after transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of drug-eluting bead and conventional chemoembolization in a retrospective controlled study.
    Lee S; Kim KM; Lee SJ; Lee KH; Lee DY; Kim MD; Kim DY; Kim SU; Won JY
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 27217418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with arterioportal fistula.
    Cai L; Li H; Guo J; Zhao W; Duan Y; Hou X; Cheng L; Du H; Shao X; Diao Z; Hao Y; Zheng X; Li C; Li W
    Cancer Biol Ther; 2022 Dec; 23(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 35230928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and Safety of Supplemental Transarterial Chemoembolization Through Extrahepatic Collateral Arteries with Drug-eluting Beads: Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Chiu SH; Chang PY; Shih YL; Huang WY; Ko KH; Chang WC; Huang GS
    Drug Des Devel Ther; 2020; 14():5029-5041. PubMed ID: 33235441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors of liver abscess and biloma formation after drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Bian L; Yang J; Song Z
    Arab J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; 25(2):176-181. PubMed ID: 38388217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs conventional TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple conventional TACE treatments history: A comparison of efficacy and safety.
    Li H; Wu F; Duan M; Zhang G
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(21):e15314. PubMed ID: 31124925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-arterial therapy of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases: comparing conventional TACE, drug-eluting beads TACE and yttrium-90 radioembolisation as treatment options using a propensity score analysis model.
    Do Minh D; Chapiro J; Gorodetski B; Huang Q; Liu C; Smolka S; Savic LJ; Wainstejn D; Lin M; Schlachter T; Gebauer B; Geschwind JF
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):4995-5005. PubMed ID: 28677067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of drug-eluting bead (vs. conventional) transarterial chemoembolization on hepatic fibrosis in treating intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Li H; Liang C; Kuang D; Huang G; Zhang M; Chen P; Zheng Q; Xu W; Ren J; Han X; Duan X
    Cancer Biol Ther; 2023 Dec; 24(1):2166335. PubMed ID: 36751709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.