These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2743618)

  • 1. Accuracy of the Takeda TM-2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor.
    Russell AE; Tonkin AL; Wing LM; Hassam RM; McRitchie RJ; Aylward PE; Minson RB; Bune AJ; West MJ; Chalmers JP
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1989 Apr; 16(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 2743618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Takeda Medical (A & D) TM 2420 ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Practical experience and comparison with direct and indirect measurements.
    Høegholm A; Eidemak I; Kristensen KS; Bang LE; Madsen NH
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1992 Jun; 52(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 1439512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal size of cuff bladder for indirect measurement of arterial pressure in adults.
    Russell AE; Wing LM; Smith SA; Aylward PE; McRitchie RJ; Hassam RM; West MJ; Chalmers JP
    J Hypertens; 1989 Aug; 7(8):607-13. PubMed ID: 2681407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure determinations using the Remler and Spacelabs devices].
    Pagny JY; Chatellier G; Devriès C; Janod JP; Corvol P; Ménard J
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Jun; 79(6):901-6. PubMed ID: 3099709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Suntech Accutracker. A novel noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitor.
    Nelson KS; Weber RR; Elliott WJ; Zebrauskas D; Murphy MB
    Am J Hypertens; 1988 Jul; 1(3 Pt 3):121S-123S. PubMed ID: 3415784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical validation of the accutracker, a novel ambulatory blood pressure monitor using R-wave gating for Korotkoff sounds.
    White WB; Schulman P; McCabe EJ; Nardone MB
    J Clin Hypertens; 1987 Dec; 3(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 3453385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of blood pressure measurements by auscultation and Physiometrics Infrasonde recording techniques.
    van den Berg BJ
    Hypertension; 1980; 2(4 Pt 2):I8-17. PubMed ID: 7399640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The conventional (Velcro self-adhesive) cuff overestimates blood pressure in infants. Description of a suitable alternative.
    Spiess B; Leumann EP
    Helv Paediatr Acta; 1984 May; 39(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 6399715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the reproducibility and accuracy of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring using the Takeda TM-2420 automated blood pressure monitor.
    Kelly JJ; Hunyor SN; Ho KY
    Clin Exp Hypertens; 1993 Mar; 15(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 8467317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of the Colin ABPM 630 at rest and during exercise: an ambulatory blood pressure monitor with gas-powered cuff inflation.
    White WB; Lund-Johansen P; McCabe EJ
    J Hypertens; 1989 Jun; 7(6):477-83. PubMed ID: 2778314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurement techniques via the coccygeal artery in anesthetized cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus).
    Sadler RA; Hall NH; Kass PH; Citino SB
    J Zoo Wildl Med; 2013 Dec; 44(4):928-35. PubMed ID: 24450051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation.
    Stewart MJ; Gough K; Padfield PL
    J Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 13(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 7622850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated blood pressure measurements during exercise.
    Lightfoot JT; Tankersley C; Rowe SA; Freed AN; Fortney SM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1989 Dec; 21(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 2626094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of the Surgivet V60046, a non invasive blood pressure monitor in anaesthetized dogs.
    Deflandre CJ; Hellebrekers LJ
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 35(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 17696973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambulatory blood pressure recorder.
    Stein IM; Peterson R; Lee A
    Med Instrum; 1983; 17(5):352-4. PubMed ID: 6646022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
    Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the accuracy and reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the very elderly using the Takeda TM-2420.
    Johnson AG; Nuygen TV; Day RO
    J Hum Hypertens; 1994 Jun; 8(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 8089828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of different methods of blood pressure measurements.
    Chrubasik S; Droste C; Glimm E; Black A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 17496465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of the HoMedics Walgreens Deluxe Arm Blood Pressure device (WGNBPA-540) compared with auscultation in 85 individuals.
    Yarows SA
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Aug; 16(4):200-2. PubMed ID: 21654318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.