BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27436415)

  • 1. Evaluating alcohol use among Russian women at risk for an alcohol-exposed pregnancy: A comparison of three measures of alcohol use.
    Balachova T; Sobell LC; Agrawal S; Isurina G; Tsvetkova L; Volkova E; Bohora S
    J Ethn Subst Abuse; 2018; 17(3):324-334. PubMed ID: 27436415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Quick Drinking Screen for identifying women at risk for an alcohol-exposed pregnancy.
    Dum M; Sobell LC; Sobell MB; Heinecke N; Voluse A; Johnson K
    Addict Behav; 2009 Sep; 34(9):714-6. PubMed ID: 19406583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a quick drinking screen with the timeline followback for individuals with alcohol problems.
    Sobell LC; Agrawal S; Sobell MB; Leo GI; Young LJ; Cunningham JA; Simco ER
    J Stud Alcohol; 2003 Nov; 64(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 14743950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a single binge drinking question to identify Russian women at risk for an alcohol-exposed pregnancy.
    Balachova T; Sobell LC; Agrawal S; Isurina G; Tsvetkova L; Volkova E; Bohora S
    Addict Behav; 2015 Jul; 46():53-7. PubMed ID: 25800361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the quick drinking screen and the alcohol timeline followback with outpatient alcohol abusers.
    Roy M; Dum M; Sobell LC; Sobell MB; Simco ER; Manor H; Palmerio R
    Subst Use Misuse; 2008 Dec; 43(14):2116-23. PubMed ID: 18825590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two Brief Measures of Alcohol Use Produce Different Results: AUDIT-C and Quick Drinking Screen.
    Letourneau B; Sobell LC; Sobell MB; Agrawal S; Gioia CJ
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 May; 41(5):1035-1043. PubMed ID: 28247424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A modified Timeline Followback assessment to capture alcohol exposure in pregnant women: Application in the Safe Passage Study.
    Dukes K; Tripp T; Petersen J; Robinson F; Odendaal H; Elliott A; Willinger M; Hereld D; Raffo C; Kinney HC; Groenewald C; Angal J; Young R; Burd L;
    Alcohol; 2017 Aug; 62():17-27. PubMed ID: 28755748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Convergence of online daily diaries and timeline followback among women at risk for alcohol exposed pregnancy.
    Chow PI; Lord HR; MacDonnell K; Ritterband LM; Ingersoll KS
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2017 Nov; 82():7-11. PubMed ID: 29021118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a multisubstance online Timeline Followback assessment.
    Martin-Willett R; Helmuth T; Abraha M; Bryan AD; Hitchcock L; Lee K; Bidwell LC
    Brain Behav; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e01486. PubMed ID: 31793226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A group-administered Timeline Followback assessment of alcohol use.
    LaBrie J; Pedersen E; Earleywine M
    J Stud Alcohol; 2005 Sep; 66(5):693-7. PubMed ID: 16329460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drinking-related assessment instruments: cross-cultural studies.
    Annis HM; Sobell LC; Ayala-Velazquez H; Rybakowski JK; Sandahl C; Saunders B; Thomas S; Ziołkowski M
    Subst Use Misuse; 1996; 31(11-12):1525-46. PubMed ID: 8908706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unexpectedly high prevalence of alcohol use among pregnant Swedish women: failed detection by antenatal care and simple tools that improve detection.
    Magnusson A; Göransson M; Heilig M
    J Stud Alcohol; 2005 Mar; 66(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15957666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-cultural evaluation of two drinking assessment instruments: alcohol timeline followback and inventory of drinking situations.
    Sobell LC; Agrawal S; Annis H; Ayala-Velazquez H; Echeverria L; Leo GI; Rybakowski JK; Sandahl C; Saunders B; Thomas S; Zióikowski M
    Subst Use Misuse; 2001 Feb; 36(3):313-31. PubMed ID: 11325169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between two retrospective alcohol consumption measures and the daily drinking diary method with university students.
    Patterson C; Hogan L; Cox M
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2019; 45(3):248-253. PubMed ID: 30230918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of the Alcohol Timeline Followback when administered by telephone and by computer.
    Sobell LC; Brown J; Leo GI; Sobell MB
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1996 Sep; 42(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8889403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying hazardous alcohol consumption during pregnancy: implementing a research-based model in real life.
    Göransson M; Magnusson A; Heilig M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):657-62. PubMed ID: 16752255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a screening test for alcohol use, the Russian Federation.
    Neufeld M; Rehm J; Bunova A; Gil A; Gornyi B; Rovira P; Manthey J; Yurasova E; Dolgova S; Idrisov B; Moskvicheva M; Nabiullina G; Shegaym O; Zhidkova I; Ziganshina Z; Ferreira-Borges C;
    Bull World Health Organ; 2021 Jul; 99(7):496-505. PubMed ID: 34248222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of the Timeline Followback for cocaine, cannabis, and cigarette use.
    Robinson SM; Sobell LC; Sobell MB; Leo GI
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2014 Mar; 28(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 23276315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Levels and patterns of alcohol consumption using timeline follow-back, daily diaries and real-time "electronic interviews".
    Carney MA; Tennen H; Affleck G; Del Boca FK; Kranzler HR
    J Stud Alcohol; 1998 Jul; 59(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 9647427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do attitudes and knowledge predict at-risk drinking among Russian women?
    Balachova T; Bard D; Bonner B; Chaffin M; Isurina G; Tsvetkova L; Volkova E
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2016 May; 42(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 27074154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.