These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27436502)

  • 21. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs: surgical technique.
    Luna JT; Sembrano JN; Gioe TJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Sep; 92 Suppl 1 Pt 2():240-9. PubMed ID: 20844179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Equivalent outcomes of ultra-congruent and standard cruciate-retaining inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    Vishwanathan K; Kambhampati SBS; Vaishya R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Sep; 30(9):3076-3091. PubMed ID: 35013748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Unsatisfactory clinical outcomes of second-generation mobile bearing floating platform total knee arthroplasty: comparing outcomes with fixed bearing after five years minimum.
    Yoon JR; Yang JH
    Int Orthop; 2018 Nov; 42(11):2583-2589. PubMed ID: 29556754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Five-year comparison of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium femoral components in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hui C; Salmon L; Maeno S; Roe J; Walsh W; Pinczewski L
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(7):624-30. PubMed ID: 21471415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 12-Year clinical and radiological results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Kersten RFMR; de Vries AJ; van Raaij JJAM; Brouwer RW
    Knee; 2023 Dec; 45():110-116. PubMed ID: 37925801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Comparison of 2 Tibial Inserts of Different Constraint for Cruciate-Retaining Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Additional Tool for Balancing the Posterior Cruciate Ligament.
    Emerson RH; Barrington JW; Olugbode SA; Alnachoukati OK
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Feb; 31(2):425-8. PubMed ID: 26481407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Marr JT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical and radiological results of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty with the NexGen®-CR system: comparison of patellar resurfacing versus retention with more than 14 years of follow-up.
    Chun KC; Lee SH; Baik JS; Kook SH; Han JK; Chun CH
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Oct; 12(1):144. PubMed ID: 28969683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient reported outcomes and implant survivorship after Total knee arthroplasty with the persona knee implant system: two year follow up.
    Mathijssen NMC; Verburg H; London NJ; Landsiedl M; Dominkus M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Mar; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 30832636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Posterior cruciate-retaining, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: minimum 4-year follow-up study.
    Elwood JJ; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD
    Orthopedics; 2012 Dec; 35(12):e1699-704. PubMed ID: 23218624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medial congruent polyethylene design show different tibiofemoral kinematics and enhanced congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining design for total knee arthroplasty-an in vivo randomized controlled study of gait using dynamic radiostereometry.
    Petersen ET; Rytter S; Koppens D; Dalsgaard J; Hansen TB; Andersen MS; Stilling M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Mar; 31(3):933-945. PubMed ID: 35809105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of high-flexion and standard cruciate-retaining designs.
    Seon JK; Park SJ; Lee KB; Yoon TR; Kozanek M; Song EK
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91(3):672-9. PubMed ID: 19255229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses.
    Ishii Y; Noguchi H; Sato J; Sakurai T; Toyabe SI
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3536-3542. PubMed ID: 27485124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity.
    Ünkar EA; Öztürkmen Y; Şükür E; Çarkçı E; Mert M
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):95-99. PubMed ID: 28108167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement.
    Dowsey MM; Gould DJ; Spelman T; Pandy MG; Choong PF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1583-1590.e2. PubMed ID: 32139194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Higher Frequency of Reoperation With a New Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Christensen JC; Brothers J; Stoddard GJ; Anderson MB; Pelt CE; Gililland JM; Peters CL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27043727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Posterior cruciate-substituting total knee replacement recovers the flexion arc faster in the early postoperative period in knees with high varus deformity: a prospective randomized study.
    Öztürk A; Akalın Y; Çevik N; Otuzbir A; Özkan Y; Dostabakan Y
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Jul; 136(7):999-1006. PubMed ID: 27271754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproducing the Native Posterior Tibial Slope in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Technique and Clinical Implications.
    Howard JL; Morcos MW; Lanting BA; Somerville LE; McAuley JP
    Orthopedics; 2020 Jan; 43(1):e21-e26. PubMed ID: 31770448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. No Difference in Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
    van den Boom LGH; Brouwer RW; van den Akker-Scheek I; Reininga IHF; de Vries AJ; Bierma-Zeinstra SMA; van Raay JJAM
    J Knee Surg; 2020 Dec; 33(12):1243-1250. PubMed ID: 31284323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.