These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27436523)

  • 1. Demographic history, current expansion and future management challenges of wild boar populations in the Balkans and Europe.
    Veličković N; Ferreira E; Djan M; Ernst M; Obreht Vidaković D; Monaco A; Fonseca C
    Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Nov; 117(5):348-357. PubMed ID: 27436523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of human perturbation on the genetic make-up of an island population: the case of the Sardinian wild boar.
    Scandura M; Iacolina L; Cossu A; Apollonio M
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 106(6):1012-20. PubMed ID: 21179064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): a microsatellite analysis.
    Vernesi C; Crestanello B; Pecchioli E; Tartari D; Caramelli D; Hauffe H; Bertorelle G
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Mar; 12(3):585-95. PubMed ID: 12675815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conservation genomic analysis of domestic and wild pig populations from the Iberian Peninsula.
    Herrero-Medrano JM; Megens HJ; Groenen MA; Ramis G; Bosse M; Pérez-Enciso M; Crooijmans RP
    BMC Genet; 2013 Oct; 14():106. PubMed ID: 24172017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel Y-chromosome short tandem repeats in Sus scrofa and their variation in European wild boar and domestic pig populations.
    Iacolina L; Brajković V; Canu A; Šprem N; Cubric-Curik V; Fontanesi L; Saarma U; Apollonio M; Scandura M
    Anim Genet; 2016 Dec; 47(6):682-690. PubMed ID: 27558303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) population in Lithuania.
    Griciuvienė L; Janeliūnas Ž; Jurgelevičius V; Paulauskas A
    BMC Genom Data; 2021 Nov; 22(1):53. PubMed ID: 34837959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary genetic structure, phylogeography and past demographic processes of wild boar Sus scrofa population in Central and Eastern Europe.
    Kusza S; Podgórski T; Scandura M; Borowik T; Jávor A; Sidorovich VE; Bunevich AN; Kolesnikov M; Jędrzejewska B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91401. PubMed ID: 24622149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (
    Mihalik B; Frank K; Astuti PK; Szemethy D; Szendrei L; Szemethy L; Kusza S; Stéger V
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 33066463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations from East Asia based on microsatellite loci analyses.
    Choi SK; Lee JE; Kim YJ; Min MS; Voloshina I; Myslenkov A; Oh JG; Kim TH; Markov N; Seryodkin I; Ishiguro N; Yu L; Zhang YP; Lee H; Kim KS
    BMC Genet; 2014 Jul; 15():85. PubMed ID: 25034725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable?
    Scandura M; Iacolina L; Crestanello B; Pecchioli E; Di Benedetto MF; Russo V; Davoli R; Apollonio M; Bertorelle G
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Apr; 17(7):1745-62. PubMed ID: 18371016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing population structure and migration patterns of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Japan.
    Sawai K; Arakawa A; Taniguchi M; Xiao B; Sawai M; Osaki M; Yamaguchi E; Hayama Y; Murato Y; Shimizu Y; Kondo S; Yamamoto T
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):21186. PubMed ID: 38040788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic population structure defines wild boar as an urban exploiter species in Barcelona, Spain.
    Hagemann J; Conejero C; Stillfried M; Mentaberre G; Castillo-Contreras R; Fickel J; López-Olvera JR
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 833():155126. PubMed ID: 35405223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What drives wild boar density and population growth in Mediterranean environments?
    Colomer J; Massei G; Roos D; Rosell C; Rodríguez-Teijeiro JD
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; 931():172739. PubMed ID: 38697537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Romanian wild boars and Mangalitza pigs have a European ancestry and harbour genetic signatures compatible with past population bottlenecks.
    Manunza A; Amills M; Noce A; Cabrera B; Zidi A; Eghbalsaied S; de Albornoz EC; Portell M; Mercadé A; Sànchez A; Balteanu V
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():29913. PubMed ID: 27418428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conservation phylogeography: does historical diversity contribute to regional vulnerability in European tree frogs (Hyla arborea)?
    Dufresnes C; Wassef J; Ghali K; Brelsford A; Stöck M; Lymberakis P; Crnobrnja-Isailovic J; Perrin N
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Nov; 22(22):5669-84. PubMed ID: 24102652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Red deer in Iberia: Molecular ecological studies in a southern refugium and inferences on European postglacial colonization history.
    Queirós J; Acevedo P; Santos JPV; Barasona J; Beltran-Beck B; González-Barrio D; Armenteros JA; Diez-Delgado I; Boadella M; Fernandéz de Mera I; Ruiz-Fons JF; Vicente J; de la Fuente J; Gortázar C; Searle JB; Alves PC
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210282. PubMed ID: 30620758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial genetic structure of European wild boar, with inferences on late-Pleistocene and Holocene demographic history.
    de Jong JF; Iacolina L; Prins HHT; van Hooft P; Crooijmans RPMA; van Wieren SE; Baños JV; Baubet E; Cahill S; Ferreira E; Fonseca C; Glazov PM; Jelenko Turinek I; Lizana Martín VM; Náhlik A; Pokorny B; Podgórski T; Šprem N; Veeroja R; Ydenberg RC; Megens HJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2023 Mar; 130(3):135-144. PubMed ID: 36639700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clear phylogeographic pattern and genetic structure of wild boar Sus scrofa population in Central and Eastern Europe.
    Niedziałkowska M; Tarnowska E; Ligmanowska J; Jędrzejewska B; Podgórski T; Radziszewska A; Ratajczyk I; Kusza S; Bunevich AN; Danila G; Shkvyria M; Grzybowski T; Woźniak M
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9680. PubMed ID: 33958636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic consequences of a century of inbreeding and isolation in the Danish wild boar population.
    Yıldız B; Megens HJ; Hvilsom C; Bosse M
    Evol Appl; 2022 Jun; 15(6):954-966. PubMed ID: 35782012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative landscape genetic analyses show a Belgian motorway to be a gene flow barrier for red deer (Cervus elaphus), but not wild boars (Sus scrofa).
    Frantz AC; Bertouille S; Eloy MC; Licoppe A; Chaumont F; Flamand MC
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Jul; 21(14):3445-57. PubMed ID: 22607276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.