219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27437368)
1. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional Glass Ionomer with 1% Ethanolic Extract of Propolis Incorporated Glass Ionomer Cement -Invitro Study.
Prabhakar AR; Balehosur DV; Basappa N
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC88-91. PubMed ID: 27437368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on antibacterial and microshear bond strength of glass-ionomer restorations to dentin.
Elmenshawy MZ; El-Haliem HA; Mowafy AM; Hamama HH
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23710. PubMed ID: 38187267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from hydroxyapatite incorporated and conventional glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study.
Tiwari S; Nandlal B
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 23514678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength and shear bond strength of GIC type IX, chlorhexidine-incorporated GIC and triclosan-incorporated GIC: An in vitro study.
Jaidka S; Somani R; Singh DJ; Shafat S
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Apr; 6(Suppl 1):S64-9. PubMed ID: 27195231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of bioactivity, fluoride release, shear bond strength, and compressive strength of conventional glass ionomer cement incorporated with three inorganic bioactive nanoparticles: An experimental analysis.
Pokharkar PM; Shashikiran ND; Gaonkar N; Gugawad S; Hadakar S; Waghmode S
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(4):445-452. PubMed ID: 36861563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated glass ionomer cement and conventional glass ionomer cement on dense synthetic hydroxyapatite disk: An in vitro study.
Choudhary K; Nandlal B
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 26096112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antimicrobial properties, compressive strength and fluoride release capacity of essential oil-modified glass ionomer cements-an in vitro study.
Sherief DI; Fathi MS; Abou El Fadl RK
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1879-1888. PubMed ID: 32803440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shear Bond Strength and Film Thickness of a Naturally Antimicrobial Modified Dental Luting Cement.
Singer L; Bourauel CP
Molecules; 2021 Feb; 26(5):. PubMed ID: 33652887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material.
Balagopal S; Nekkanti S; Kaur K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 34257171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invitro Evaluation of Fluoride Release from Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Glass Ionomer with or without Protective Coating.
Tiwari S; Nandlal B
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Apr; 10(4):ZC73-5. PubMed ID: 27190957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antibacterial and preventive effects of newly developed modified nano-chitosan/glass-ionomer restoration on simulated initial enamel caries lesions: An in vitro study.
Shalaby HA; Soliman NK; Al-Saudi KW
Dent Med Probl; 2024; 61(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 38949834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement to Er, Cr:YSGG Laser-irradiated Dentin in Primary Teeth: An
Chikkanarasaiah N; P H
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 37457206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.
Patil SM; Kamble VB; Desai RG; Arabbi KC; Prakash V
J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Aug; 9(8):ZC84-7. PubMed ID: 26436055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An
Kukreja R; Singla S; Bhadoria N; Pawar P; Gupta K; Khandelwal D; Dewani N
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(1):35-37. PubMed ID: 35528493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of propolis added to glass ionomer cement.
Hatunoğlu E; Oztürk F; Bilenler T; Aksakallı S; Simşek N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):368-73. PubMed ID: 23944222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An
Somani R; Jaidka S; Singh DJ; Sibal GK
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(3):192-196. PubMed ID: 27843248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength between Resin Composites and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement in Class II Restorative Technique-An In Vitro Study.
Bilgrami A; Maqsood A; Alam MK; Ahmed N; Mustafa M; Alqahtani AR; Alshehri A; Alqahtani AA; Alghannam S
Materials (Basel); 2022 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 35744350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antibacterial Activity and Fluoride Release of Glass-Ionomer Cement, Compomer and Zirconia Reinforced Glass-Ionomer Cement.
Tiwari S; Kenchappa M; Bhayya D; Gupta S; Saxena S; Satyarth S; Singh A; Gupta M
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Apr; 10(4):ZC90-3. PubMed ID: 27190961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an
Nanavati K; Katge F; Chimata VK; Pradhan D; Kamble A; Patil D
J Dent (Shiraz); 2021 Dec; 22(4):260-266. PubMed ID: 34904122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
