BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27438160)

  • 1. On longitudinal prediction with time-to-event outcome: Comparison of modeling options.
    Maziarz M; Heagerty P; Cai T; Zheng Y
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 27438160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partly conditional survival models for longitudinal data.
    Zheng Y; Heagerty PJ
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):379-91. PubMed ID: 16011684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two approaches to dynamic prediction: Joint modeling and landmark modeling.
    Li W; Li L; Astor BC
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(13):2101-2115. PubMed ID: 36938960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint modeling of repeated multivariate cognitive measures and competing risks of dementia and death: a latent process and latent class approach.
    Proust-Lima C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 26376900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of joint modeling and landmarking for dynamic prediction under an illness-death model.
    Suresh K; Taylor JMG; Spratt DE; Daignault S; Tsodikov A
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1277-1300. PubMed ID: 28508545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic predictions and prospective accuracy in joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data.
    Rizopoulos D
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):819-29. PubMed ID: 21306352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting methods for modeling longitudinal and survival data: Framingham Heart Study.
    Ngwa JS; Cabral HJ; Cheng DM; Gagnon DR; LaValley MP; Cupples LA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33568059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying and comparing dynamic predictive accuracy of joint models for longitudinal marker and time-to-event in presence of censoring and competing risks.
    Blanche P; Proust-Lima C; Loubère L; Berr C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):102-113. PubMed ID: 25311240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landmarking 2.0: Bridging the gap between joint models and landmarking.
    Putter H; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1901-1917. PubMed ID: 35098578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Gaussian copula approach for dynamic prediction of survival with a longitudinal biomarker.
    Suresh K; Taylor JMG; Tsodikov A
    Biostatistics; 2021 Jul; 22(3):504-521. PubMed ID: 31820798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint longitudinal and time-to-event cure models for the assessment of being cured.
    Barbieri A; Legrand C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1256-1270. PubMed ID: 31213153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-varying effect modeling with longitudinal data truncated by death: conditional models, interpretations, and inference.
    Estes JP; Nguyen DV; Dalrymple LS; Mu Y; Şentürk D
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1834-47. PubMed ID: 26646582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individualized dynamic prediction of survival with the presence of intermediate events.
    Papageorgiou G; Mokhles MM; Takkenberg JJM; Rizopoulos D
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(30):5623-5640. PubMed ID: 31667885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint modeling of cross-sectional health outcomes and longitudinal predictors via mixtures of means and variances.
    Jiang B; Elliott MR; Sammel MD; Wang N
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):487-97. PubMed ID: 25652674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic predictions with time-dependent covariates in survival analysis using joint modeling and landmarking.
    Rizopoulos D; Molenberghs G; Lesaffre EMEH
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 28792080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A copula-based approach for dynamic prediction of survival with a binary time-dependent covariate.
    Suresh K; Taylor JMG; Tsodikov A
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(23):4931-4946. PubMed ID: 34124771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. H-likelihood approach for joint modeling of longitudinal outcomes and time-to-event data.
    Ha ID; Noh M; Lee Y
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1122-1143. PubMed ID: 29139605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variable selection for joint models of multivariate longitudinal measurements and event time data.
    Chen Y; Wang Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3820-3829. PubMed ID: 28707701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling longitudinal data with nonparametric multiplicative random effects jointly with survival data.
    Ding J; Wang JL
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):546-56. PubMed ID: 17888040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.