These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27438241)

  • 41. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Demonstrating ultra-filtration and reverse osmosis performance using size exclusion chromatography.
    Henderson RK; Stuetz RM; Khan SJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(12):2747-53. PubMed ID: 21123902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Membrane treatment of alkaline bleaching effluents from elementary chlorine free kraft softwood cellulose production.
    Oñate E; Rodríguez E; Bórquez R; Zaror C
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(5-8):890-900. PubMed ID: 25253193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Removal of pharmaceuticals from MWTP effluent by nanofiltration and solar photo-Fenton using two different iron complexes at neutral pH.
    Miralles-Cuevas S; Oller I; Pérez JAS; Malato S
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():23-31. PubMed ID: 25025178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results.
    Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
    Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Optimization of "Serpa" cheese whey nanofiltration for effluent minimization and by-products recovery.
    Minhalma M; Magueijo V; Queiroz DP; de Pinho MN
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 16616409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
    Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Water recovery from sewage using forward osmosis.
    Lutchmiah K; Cornelissen ER; Harmsen DJ; Post JW; Lampi K; Ramaekers H; Rietveld LC; Roest K
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(7):1443-9. PubMed ID: 22179641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Process water treatment at the Ranger uranium mine, Northern Australia.
    Topp H; Russell H; Davidson J; Jones D; Levy V; Gilderdale M; Davis S; Ring R; Conway G; Macintosh P; Sertorio L
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(10):155-62. PubMed ID: 12862230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Rejection of haloacetic acids in water by multi-stage reverse osmosis: Efficiency, mechanisms, and influencing factors.
    Wang L; Sun Y; Chen B
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():383-392. PubMed ID: 30056322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
    Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
    Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Treatment of dairy wastewater by two-stage membrane operation with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration.
    Gong YW; Zhang HX; Cheng XN
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 22339027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Re-use of biologically treated wastewater of a brewery.
    Cornelissen ER; Philips N; Dewaele B; Boeren S; Koning J
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(3a):95-102. PubMed ID: 15954568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Short- and long-term fouling characteristics of reverse osmosis membrane at full scale leachate treatment plant.
    Rukapan W; Khananthai B; Chiemchaisri C; Chiemchaisri W; Srisukphun T
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 22173416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Integrated pretreatment with capacitive deionization for reverse osmosis reject recovery from water reclamation plant.
    Lee LY; Ng HY; Ong SL; Tao G; Kekre K; Viswanath B; Lay W; Seah H
    Water Res; 2009 Oct; 43(18):4769-77. PubMed ID: 19700181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry.
    Ben Amar N; Kechaou N; Palmeri J; Deratani A; Sghaier A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19497667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.