133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27438775)
1. Reducing Costs of Breast Examination: Ultrasound Performance and Inter-Observer Variability of Expert Radiologists Versus Residents.
Di Grezia G; Somma F; Serra N; Reginelli A; Cappabianca S; Grassi R; Gatta G
Cancer Invest; 2016 Aug; 34(7):355-60. PubMed ID: 27438775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the accuracy of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in breast ultrasound according to the radiologist's experience.
Chabi ML; Borget I; Ardiles R; Aboud G; Boussouar S; Vilar V; Dromain C; Balleyguier C
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 22310523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The current state of the diagnostics of breast diseases in Lombardy].
Vergnaghi D; Panizza P; Gozzi G
Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 11213407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who should be performing routine abdominal ultrasound? A prospective double-blind study comparing the accuracy of radiologist and radiographer.
Leslie A; Lockyer H; Virjee JP
Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):606-9. PubMed ID: 10964731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.
Elmore JG; Wells CK; Lee CH; Howard DH; Feinstein AR
N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(22):1493-9. PubMed ID: 7969300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized cine-loop documentation in abdominal ultrasound facilitates offline image interpretation.
Dormagen JB; Gaarder M; Drolsum A
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 24345769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standardized cine-loop documentation in renal ultrasound facilitates skill-mix between radiographer and radiologist.
Gaarder M; Seierstad T; Søreng R; Drolsum A; Begum K; Dormagen JB
Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 24615418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographer-acquired and radiologist-reviewed ultrasound examination--agreement with radiologist's bedside evaluation.
Stenman C; Thorelius L; Knutsson A; Smedby Ö
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 21498329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An audit of a radiographer based ultrasound service.
Weston MJ; Morse A; Slack NF
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):665-7. PubMed ID: 8062007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability in the BI-RADS ultrasound system].
Santana Montesdeoca JM; Gómez Arnáiz A; Fuentes Pavón R; Alemán Flores P; Limiñana Cañal JM; Jorrín Moreno A
Radiologia; 2009; 51(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 19604529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical-office-based versus radiology-referral-based breast ultrasonography: a comparison of efficiency, cost, and patient satisfaction.
Layeequr Rahman R; Crawford S; Hall T; Bavosi D; Quinlan R
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Nov; 207(5):763-6. PubMed ID: 18954791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative breast problem--focused sonography a valuable tool in the training of surgical residents.
Raghavan K; Shah AK; Cosgrove JM
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(5):350-3. PubMed ID: 18809164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative imaging prior to breast reconstruction surgery: benchmarking bringing together radiologists and plastic surgeons. Proposed guidelines.
Carloni R; Delay E; Gourari A; Ho Quoc C; Tourasse C; Balleyguier C; Forme N; Goga D
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2014 Apr; 59(2):e13-9. PubMed ID: 24556529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-professional agreement of ultrasound-based diagnoses in patients with shoulder pain between physical therapists and radiologists in the Netherlands.
Thoomes-de Graaf M; Scholten-Peeters GG; Duijn E; Karel YH; van den Borne MP; Beumer A; Ottenheijm RP; Dinant GJ; Tetteroo E; Lucas C; Koes BW; Verhagen AP
Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):478-83. PubMed ID: 24898215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of chest radiograph reports.
Hirvonen-Kari M; Sormaala MJ; Luoma K; Kivisaari L; Lohman M
Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):926-31. PubMed ID: 24132767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver Agreement between On-Call Radiology Resident and General Radiologist Interpretations of CT Pulmonary Angiograms and CT Venograms.
Tamjeedi B; Correa J; Semionov A; Mesurolle B
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126116. PubMed ID: 25938666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care?
Gutzeit A; Heiland R; Sudarski S; Froehlich JM; Hergan K; Meissnitzer M; Kos S; Bertke P; Kolokythas O; Koh DM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):224-231. PubMed ID: 29943178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]