These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27439873)

  • 1. Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness.
    Jordan JJ; Hoffman M; Nowak MA; Rand DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(31):8658-63. PubMed ID: 27439873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness.
    Jordan JJ; Hoffman M; Bloom P; Rand DG
    Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7591):473-6. PubMed ID: 26911783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Third-party punishment as a costly signal of high continuation probabilities in repeated games.
    Jordan JJ; Rand DG
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 421():189-202. PubMed ID: 28390842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cooperate without looking: why we care what people think and not just what they do.
    Hoffman M; Yoeli E; Nowak MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(6):1727-32. PubMed ID: 25624473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.
    van 't Wout M; Sanfey AG
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 18721917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies.
    Romano A; Balliet D; Yamagishi T; Liu JH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):12702-12707. PubMed ID: 29133403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why so cynical?: asymmetric feedback underlies misguided skepticism regarding the trustworthiness of others.
    Fetchenhauer D; Dunning D
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 20424043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static network structure can stabilize human cooperation.
    Rand DG; Nowak MA; Fowler JH; Christakis NA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(48):17093-8. PubMed ID: 25404308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cooperation as a signal of time preferences.
    Lie-Panis J; André JB
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Apr; 289(1973):20212266. PubMed ID: 35473379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seeing is believing: trustworthiness as a dynamic belief.
    Chang LJ; Doll BB; van 't Wout M; Frank MJ; Sanfey AG
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):87-105. PubMed ID: 20553763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Small groups and long memories promote cooperation.
    Stewart AJ; Plotkin JB
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():26889. PubMed ID: 27247059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cooperation and Shared Beliefs about Trust in the Assurance Game.
    Jansson F; Eriksson K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144191. PubMed ID: 26640892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychology and economics. Strategizing in the brain.
    Camerer CF
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1673-5. PubMed ID: 12805527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games.
    Santos FC; Santos MD; Pacheco JM
    Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7201):213-6. PubMed ID: 18615084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acting without considering personal costs signals trustworthiness in helpers but not punishers.
    Engeler NC; Raihani NJ
    Commun Psychol; 2024 May; 2(1):47. PubMed ID: 39242913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reputation offsets trust judgments based on social biases among Airbnb users.
    Abrahao B; Parigi P; Gupta A; Cook KS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(37):9848-9853. PubMed ID: 28847948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Getting off on the wrong foot: the timing of a breach and the restoration of trust.
    Lount RB; Zhong CB; Sivanathan N; Murnighan JK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1601-12. PubMed ID: 19050335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic trust in young children.
    Rosati AG; Benjamin N; Pieloch K; Warneken F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jul; 286(1907):20190822. PubMed ID: 31337306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. People making deontological judgments in the Trapdoor dilemma are perceived to be more prosocial in economic games than they actually are.
    Capraro V; Sippel J; Zhao B; Hornischer L; Savary M; Terzopoulou Z; Faucher P; Griffioen SF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205066. PubMed ID: 30307977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.
    Yamagishi T; Matsumoto Y; Kiyonari T; Takagishi H; Li Y; Kanai R; Sakagami M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):6394-6399. PubMed ID: 28559334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.