These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27440056)

  • 1. Cancer patients' attitudes and experiences of online access to their electronic medical records: A qualitative study.
    Rexhepi H; Åhlfeldt RM; Cajander Å; Huvila I
    Health Informatics J; 2018 Jun; 24(2):115-124. PubMed ID: 27440056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing and Implementing Patients' Full-Scale Electronic Access to Their Health Record.
    Sørensen T; Johansen MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 228():85-9. PubMed ID: 27577347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring patients' perceptions of accessing electronic health records: Innovation in healthcare.
    Wass S; Vimarlund V; Ros A
    Health Informatics J; 2019 Mar; 25(1):203-215. PubMed ID: 28457195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ophthalmology patients' interest in online access to clinic notes at three US clinics.
    Lee BS; Oster NV; Chen GY; Ding LL; Walker JD; Elmore JG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):420-427. PubMed ID: 28417473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The urban underserved: attitudes towards gaining full access to electronic medical records.
    Dhanireddy S; Walker J; Reisch L; Oster N; Delbanco T; Elmore JG
    Health Expect; 2014 Oct; 17(5):724-32. PubMed ID: 22738155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy.
    Vodicka E; Mejilla R; Leveille SG; Ralston JD; Darer JD; Delbanco T; Walker J; Elmore JG
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Sep; 15(9):e208. PubMed ID: 24072335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shining a light on patient engagement. How one hospital places the tools for engagement in the hands of the patients.
    Leventhal R
    Healthc Inform; 2013 Sep; 30(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 24224339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open Oncology Notes: A Qualitative Study of Oncology Patients' Experiences Reading Their Cancer Care Notes.
    Kayastha N; Pollak KI; LeBlanc TW
    J Oncol Pract; 2018 Apr; 14(4):e251-e258. PubMed ID: 29443650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods.
    Esch T; Mejilla R; Anselmo M; Podtschaske B; Delbanco T; Walker J
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e010034. PubMed ID: 26826154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Why Do They Need to Check Me?" Patient Participation Through eHealth and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Study.
    Grünloh C; Myreteg G; Cajander Å; Rexhepi H
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e11. PubMed ID: 29335237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients' access to their electronic record: offer patients access as soon as you can.
    Fisher B
    Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Jun; 63(611):e423-5. PubMed ID: 23735414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experiences of Healthcare Professionals to the Introduction in Sweden of a Public eHealth Service: Patients' Online Access to their Electronic Health Records.
    Ålander T; Scandurra I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():153-7. PubMed ID: 26262029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefit-risk of Patients' Online Access to their Medical Records: Consensus Exercise of an International Expert Group.
    Liyanage H; Liaw ST; Konstantara E; Mold F; Schreiber R; Kuziemsky C; Terry AL; de Lusignan S
    Yearb Med Inform; 2018 Aug; 27(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 29681044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness.
    Winkelman WJ; Leonard KJ; Rossos PG
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2005; 12(3):306-14. PubMed ID: 15684128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient Rationales Against the Use of Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records: Qualitative Study.
    Valeur HS; Lie AK; Moen K
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 May; 23(5):e24090. PubMed ID: 34047711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Access to Radiology Reports via an Online Patient Portal: Experiences of Referring Physicians and Patients.
    Henshaw D; Okawa G; Ching K; Garrido T; Qian H; Tsai J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):582-6.e1. PubMed ID: 26047399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspective of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed-Methods Study.
    Baun C; Vogsen M; Nielsen MK; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Hildebrandt MG
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Feb; 22(2):e15723. PubMed ID: 32039819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services.
    Palen TE; Ross C; Powers JD; Xu S
    JAMA; 2012 Nov; 308(19):2012-9. PubMed ID: 23168824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurse and physician perspectives on patients with cancer having online access to their laboratory results.
    Rodriguez ES; Thom B; Schneider SM
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Jul; 38(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 21708538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. OpenNotes in oncology: oncologists' perceptions and a baseline of the content and style of their clinician notes.
    Alpert JM; Morris BB; Thomson MD; Matin K; Geyer CE; Brown RF
    Transl Behav Med; 2019 Mar; 9(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 29596633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.