These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27440663)

  • 1. Genetics of complex traits: prediction of phenotype, identification of causal polymorphisms and genetic architecture.
    Goddard ME; Kemper KE; MacLeod IM; Chamberlain AJ; Hayes BJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jul; 283(1835):. PubMed ID: 27440663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome-wide association studies to identify quantitative trait loci affecting milk production traits in water buffalo.
    Liu JJ; Liang AX; Campanile G; Plastow G; Zhang C; Wang Z; Salzano A; Gasparrini B; Cassandro M; Yang LG
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):433-444. PubMed ID: 29128211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
    Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic consequences of selection and genome-wide association mapping in soybean.
    Wen Z; Boyse JF; Song Q; Cregan PB; Wang D
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):671. PubMed ID: 26334313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic Prediction for Quantitative Traits Is Improved by Mapping Variants to Gene Ontology Categories in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Edwards SM; Sørensen IF; Sarup P; Mackay TF; Sørensen P
    Genetics; 2016 Aug; 203(4):1871-83. PubMed ID: 27235308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data.
    Lee SH; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME; Visscher PM
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Oct; 4(10):e1000231. PubMed ID: 18949033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploiting biological priors and sequence variants enhances QTL discovery and genomic prediction of complex traits.
    MacLeod IM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Haile-Mariam M; Kemper KE; Chamberlain AJ; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Feb; 17():144. PubMed ID: 26920147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.
    Gebreyesus G; Lund MS; Buitenhuis B; Bovenhuis H; Poulsen NA; Janss LG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):89. PubMed ID: 29207947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic variation and association mapping for 12 agronomic traits in indica rice.
    Lu Q; Zhang M; Niu X; Wang S; Xu Q; Feng Y; Wang C; Deng H; Yuan X; Yu H; Wang Y; Wei X
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1067. PubMed ID: 26673149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep.
    Bolormaa S; Swan AA; Brown DJ; Hatcher S; Moghaddar N; van der Werf JH; Goddard ME; Daetwyler HD
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):62. PubMed ID: 28810834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic dissection of plant growth habit in chickpea.
    Upadhyaya HD; Bajaj D; Srivastava R; Daware A; Basu U; Tripathi S; Bharadwaj C; Tyagi AK; Parida SK
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2017 Nov; 17(6):711-723. PubMed ID: 28600722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-trait Bayesian method for mapping QTL and genomic prediction.
    Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):10. PubMed ID: 29571285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
    Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breeding and Genetics Symposium: networks and pathways to guide genomic selection.
    Snelling WM; Cushman RA; Keele JW; Maltecca C; Thomas MG; Fortes MR; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Feb; 91(2):537-52. PubMed ID: 23097404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding and predicting complex traits: knowledge from cattle.
    Kemper KE; Goddard ME
    Hum Mol Genet; 2012 Oct; 21(R1):R45-51. PubMed ID: 22899652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide association study for conformation traits in three Danish pig breeds.
    Le TH; Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Sahana G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):12. PubMed ID: 28118822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Invited review: Advances and applications of random regression models: From quantitative genetics to genomics.
    Oliveira HR; Brito LF; Lourenco DAL; Silva FF; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):7664-7683. PubMed ID: 31255270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.