These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27440663)
21. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population. Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Population structure and genetic basis of the agronomic traits of upland cotton in China revealed by a genome-wide association study using high-density SNPs. Huang C; Nie X; Shen C; You C; Li W; Zhao W; Zhang X; Lin Z Plant Biotechnol J; 2017 Nov; 15(11):1374-1386. PubMed ID: 28301713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships. Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictive performance of genomic selection methods for carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle: impacts of the genetic architecture. Mehrban H; Lee DH; Moradi MH; IlCho C; Naserkheil M; Ibáñez-Escriche N Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):1. PubMed ID: 28093066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genomic prediction in biparental tropical maize populations in water-stressed and well-watered environments using low-density and GBS SNPs. Zhang X; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Semagn K; Beyene Y; Babu R; López-Cruz MA; San Vicente F; Olsen M; Buckler E; Jannink JL; Prasanna BM; Crossa J Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Mar; 114(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 25407079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens. Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Morota G; Valente BD; Kranis A; Rosa GJ; Gianola D Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():10. PubMed ID: 26842494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The utility of genomic prediction models in evolutionary genetics. McGaugh SE; Lorenz AJ; Flagel LE Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Aug; 288(1956):20210693. PubMed ID: 34344180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data. Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2629-37. PubMed ID: 26438289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Potential and limits to unravel the genetic architecture and predict the variation of Fusarium head blight resistance in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Jiang Y; Zhao Y; Rodemann B; Plieske J; Kollers S; Korzun V; Ebmeyer E; Argillier O; Hinze M; Ling J; Röder MS; Ganal MW; Mette MF; Reif JC Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Mar; 114(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 25388142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Genome-wide association for heifer reproduction and calf performance traits in beef cattle. Akanno EC; Plastow G; Fitzsimmons C; Miller SP; Baron V; Ominski K; Basarab JA Genome; 2015 Dec; 58(12):549-57. PubMed ID: 26484575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Using a system of differential equations that models cattle growth to uncover the genetic basis of complex traits. Freua MC; Santana MHA; Ventura RV; Tedeschi LO; Ferraz JBS J Appl Genet; 2017 Aug; 58(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 28382466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Goddard ME; Hayes BJ Nat Rev Genet; 2009 Jun; 10(6):381-91. PubMed ID: 19448663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program. Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multi-breed genome-wide association study reveals novel loci associated with the weight of internal organs. He Y; Li X; Zhang F; Su Y; Hou L; Chen H; Zhang Z; Huang L Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():87. PubMed ID: 26576866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of meta-analyses and joint analyses to select variants in whole genome sequences for genomic evaluation: An application in milk production of French dairy cattle breeds. Teissier M; Sanchez MP; Boussaha M; Barbat A; Hoze C; Robert-Granie C; Croiseau P J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3126-3139. PubMed ID: 29428760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Leveraging Breeding Values Obtained from Random Regression Models for Genetic Inference of Longitudinal Traits. Campbell M; Momen M; Walia H; Morota G Plant Genome; 2019 Jun; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 31290928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using Genetic Distance to Infer the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction. Scutari M; Mackay I; Balding D PLoS Genet; 2016 Sep; 12(9):e1006288. PubMed ID: 27589268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population. Cuyabano BC; Su G; Lund MS BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1171. PubMed ID: 25539631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits. Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Genome-wide association study of conformation and milk yield in mixed-breed dairy goats. Mucha S; Mrode R; Coffey M; Kizilaslan M; Desire S; Conington J J Dairy Sci; 2018 Mar; 101(3):2213-2225. PubMed ID: 29290434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]