These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27442037)

  • 1. Two dimensions of subjective uncertainty: Clues from natural language.
    Ülkümen G; Fox CR; Malle BF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1280-1297. PubMed ID: 27442037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicating Uncertainty in Benefits and Harms: A Review of Patient Decision Support Interventions.
    Bansback N; Bell M; Spooner L; Pompeo A; Han PKJ; Harrison M
    Patient; 2017 Jun; 10(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 27905072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "This Is What We Don't Know": Treating Epistemic Uncertainty in Bayesian Networks for Risk Assessment.
    Sahlin U; Helle I; Perepolkin D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2021 Jan; 17(1):221-232. PubMed ID: 33151017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A suggestion for the quantification of precise and bounded probability to quantify epistemic uncertainty in scientific assessments.
    Raices Cruz I; Troffaes MCM; Sahlin U
    Risk Anal; 2022 Feb; 42(2):239-253. PubMed ID: 35007348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disclosing the Uncertainty Associated with Prognostic Estimates in Breast Cancer.
    Engelhardt EG; Pieterse AH; Han PK; van Duijn-Bakker N; Cluitmans F; Maartense E; Bos MM; Weijl NI; Punt CJ; Quarles van Ufford-Mannesse P; Sleeboom H; Portielje JE; van der Hoeven KJ; Woei-A-Jin FJ; Kroep JR; de Haes HC; Smets EM; Stiggelbout AM
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):179-192. PubMed ID: 27681991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing epistemic sophistication by considering domain-specific absolute and multiplicistic beliefs separately.
    Peter J; Rosman T; Mayer AK; Leichner N; Krampen G
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2016 Jun; 86(2):204-21. PubMed ID: 26659464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aleatory-aware deep uncertainty quantification for transfer learning.
    Kabir HMD; Khanam S; Khozeimeh F; Khosravi A; Mondal SK; Nahavandi S; Acharya UR
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Apr; 143():105246. PubMed ID: 35131610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Known unknowns and unknown unknowns in suicide risk assessment: evidence from meta-analyses of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty.
    Large M; Galletly C; Myles N; Ryan CJ; Myles H
    BJPsych Bull; 2017 Jun; 41(3):160-163. PubMed ID: 28584653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probabilistic biosphere modeling for the long-term safety assessment of geological disposal facilities for radioactive waste using first- and second-order Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ciecior W; Röhlig KJ; Kirchner G
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Oct; 190-191():10-19. PubMed ID: 29734123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do people really prefer verbal probabilities?
    Juanchich M; Sirota M
    Psychol Res; 2020 Nov; 84(8):2325-2338. PubMed ID: 31250102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The desirability bias in predictions under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty.
    Windschitl PD; Miller JE; Park I; Rule S; Clary A; Smith AR
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105254. PubMed ID: 36029552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties can completely derail medical research results.
    Indrayan A
    J Postgrad Med; 2020; 66(2):94-98. PubMed ID: 32134004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The epistemic and aleatory uncertainties of the ETAS-type models: an application to the Central Italy seismicity.
    Lombardi AM
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11812. PubMed ID: 28924175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facing epistemic and complex uncertainty in serious illness: The role of mindfulness and shared mind.
    Epstein RM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Nov; 104(11):2635-2642. PubMed ID: 34334265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Italian epistemic marker mi sa [to me it knows] compared to so [I know], non so [I don't know], non so se [I don't know whether], credo [I believe], penso [I think].
    Riccioni I; Zuczkowski A; Burro R; Bongelli R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274694. PubMed ID: 36137275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Communicating uncertainty in cancer prognosis: A review of web-based prognostic tools.
    Harrison M; Han PKJ; Rabin B; Bell M; Kay H; Spooner L; Peacock S; Bansback N
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 May; 102(5):842-849. PubMed ID: 30579771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Politeness and the communication of uncertainty.
    Holtgraves T; Perdew A
    Cognition; 2016 Sep; 154():1-10. PubMed ID: 27232520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Irrelevance of the Risk-Uncertainty Distinction.
    Roser D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Oct; 23(5):1387-1407. PubMed ID: 28597223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Violence risk assessment in clinical settings: being sure about being sure.
    Buchanan A
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 23281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How fast can you (possibly) do it, or how long will it (certainly) take? Communicating uncertain estimates of performance time.
    Løhre E; Teigen KH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():63-73. PubMed ID: 24486808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.