BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27442344)

  • 1. Utility of intravaginal ultrasound gel for local staging of cervical carcinoma on MRI.
    Atcı N; Özgür T; Öztürk F; Dolapçıoğlu KS
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1104-1107. PubMed ID: 27442344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.
    Pálsdóttir K; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L; Alagic Z; Fischerova D; Gaurilcikas A; Hasselrot K; Jäderling F; Testa AC; Sundin A; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):773-779. PubMed ID: 33915001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Cervical Cancer: An Agreement Study.
    Arribas S; Alcázar JL; Arraiza M; Benito A; Minguez JA; Jurado M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):867-73. PubMed ID: 27022170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR imaging features and staging of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix with pathological correlations.
    Duan X; Ban X; Zhang X; Hu H; Li G; Wang D; Wang CQ; Zhang F; Shen J
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4293-4302. PubMed ID: 26995208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Diagnostic imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma: MRI, CT, and ultrasonography].
    Michniewicz K; Oellinger J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Apr; 123(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 11370531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervix and vagina in women with uterine malformations.
    Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Recio M; Ruiz-López L; Díaz D; Illescas T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 23754235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients.
    Kim SH; Choi BI; Han JK; Kim HD; Lee HP; Kang SB; Lee JY; Han MC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1993; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 8331236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Value of MRI in Early Cervical Cancer Staging with Vaginal Filling of Ultrasound Gel].
    Mou C; Lü FJ; Yu B; Xiao ZB
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 May; 52(3):523-527. PubMed ID: 34018375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of transvaginal contrast-enhanced MRI in the early staging of cervical carcinoma.
    Akata D; Kerimoglu U; Hazirolan T; Karcaaltincaba M; Köse F; Ozmen MN; Akhan O
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Aug; 15(8):1727-33. PubMed ID: 16034642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging of cervical pathology.
    Rezvani M; Shaaban A
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):94-111. PubMed ID: 19179863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-resolution T
    Hoogendam JP; Kalleveen IM; de Castro CS; Raaijmakers AJ; Verheijen RH; van den Bosch MA; Klomp DW; Zweemer RP; Veldhuis WB
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):938-945. PubMed ID: 27246722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Byun JM; Kim YN; Jeong DH; Kim KT; Sung MS; Lee KB
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Oct; 23(8):1459-64. PubMed ID: 24257560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gel Sonovaginography: A New Way of Evaluating a Variety of Local Vaginal and Cervical Disorders.
    Sibal M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Dec; 35(12):2699-2715. PubMed ID: 27821656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
    Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical carcinoma: optimized local staging with intravaginal contrast-enhanced MR imaging--preliminary results.
    Van Hoe L; Vanbeckevoort D; Oyen R; Itzlinger U; Vergote I
    Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):608-11. PubMed ID: 10551250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing packing contrast for MRI-based intracavitary brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer.
    Swanick CW; Castle KO; Rechner LA; Rauch GM; Jhingran A; Eifel PJ; Klopp AH
    Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 25620163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Uterus Cervical Carcinoma.
    Peng J; Wang W; Zeng D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(2):205-211. PubMed ID: 28234273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 IB to IIB Cervical Cancer Staging: Comparison Among Magnetic Resonance Sequences and Pathologies.
    Matsumoto YK; Kido A; Moribata Y; Chigusa Y; Himoto Y; Kurata Y; Otani S; Yajima R; Nishio N; Kuwahara R; Minamiguchi S; Mandai M; Nakamoto Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):829-836. PubMed ID: 34407060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical carcinoma: do fast SE and fat suppression techniques improve MR tumor staging at 0.5 T?
    Postema S; Peters LA; Hermans J; Trimbos JB; Pattynama PM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(5):807-11. PubMed ID: 8797918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.