These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27442645)

  • 1. Magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis.
    Qi Z; Wu B; Luo X; Zhu J; Shi H; Jin B
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(29):e4216. PubMed ID: 27442645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic navigation system and CT roadmap-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison to the conventional approach.
    Hao R; Zhang Q; Xu Z; Tang L; Yang Z; Cao K; Li C
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 25(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 23549490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic navigation facilitates percutaneous coronary intervention for complex lesions.
    Sandhu GS; Sanon S; Holmes DR; Gulati R; Brilakis ES; Lennon RJ; Rihal CS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Oct; 84(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 24327388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Ramcharitar S; van Geuns RJ; Patterson M; van der Giessen WJ; van der Ent M; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Nov; 72(6):761-70. PubMed ID: 18798236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the Stereotaxis Niobe magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 350 consecutive patients.
    Kiemeneij F; Patterson MS; Amoroso G; Laarman G; Slagboom T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Mar; 71(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 18307222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Allencherril J; Hyman D; Loya A; Jneid H; Alam M
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):199-203. PubMed ID: 31088991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetically navigated percutaneous coronary intervention in distal and/or complex lesions may improve procedural outcome and material consumption.
    IJsselmuiden AJ; Patterson MS; van Nooijen FC; Tangelder GJ; Dirksen MT; Amoroso G; Slagboom T; Serruys PW; Laarman GJ; Kiemeneij F
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Jan; 4(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 19284075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
    Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic positioning system in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention: a feasibility and safety study.
    Weisz G; Smilowitz NR; Moses JW; Rabbani LE; Collins MB; Herscovici A; Jeron A; Leon MB; Luchner A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 82(7):1084-90. PubMed ID: 23592312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial experience with a magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary artery lesions.
    Atmakuri SR; Lev EI; Alviar C; Ibarra E; Raizner AE; Solomon SL; Kleiman NS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 47(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 16458129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidewire navigation in coronary artery stenoses using a novel magnetic navigation system: first clinical experience.
    Tsuchida K; García-García HM; van der Giessen WJ; McFadden EP; van der Ent M; Sianos G; Meulenbrug H; Ong AT; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Mar; 67(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 16489562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.
    Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultra-Low Contrast Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Minimize the Risk for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.
    Azzalini L; Laricchia A; Regazzoli D; Mitomo S; Hachinohe D; Bellini B; Demir OM; Poletti E; Maccagni D; Colombo A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):176-182. PubMed ID: 30865912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of dual source computed tomography with magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study.
    Li C; Tang L; Yang Z; Cao K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 78(7):1108-15. PubMed ID: 21538793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lesion characteristics and procedural outcomes of re-attempted percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion.
    Tanabe M; Kodama K; Asada K; Kunitomo T
    Heart Vessels; 2018 Jun; 33(6):573-582. PubMed ID: 29224054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Culotte versus the novel nano-crush technique for unprotected complex bifurcation left main stenting: difference in procedural time, contrast volume and X-ray exposure and 3-years outcomes.
    Rigatelli G; Zuin M; Vassilev D; Dinh H; Giatti S; Carraro M; Zanon F; Roncon L; Dung HT
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 35(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 30446919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and technical outcomes of robotic versus manual percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jaffar-Karballai M; Haque A; Voller C; Elleithy A; Harky A
    J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 80(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 35165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry).
    Brilakis ES; Banerjee S; Karmpaliotis D; Lombardi WL; Tsai TT; Shunk KA; Kennedy KF; Spertus JA; Holmes DR; Grantham JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):245-253. PubMed ID: 25700746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.